2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-018-00776-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential access to metal wealth from colony to capital to collapse at Phoenician and Punic Carthage: non-ferrous alloys and mineral resources from the Bir Massouda site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to reconstruct the development of Phoenician metallurgy go back to the limited surveys of copper and iron production at Phoenician sites of the Iberian Peninsula, Sardinia, and North Africa. [ 17–21 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to reconstruct the development of Phoenician metallurgy go back to the limited surveys of copper and iron production at Phoenician sites of the Iberian Peninsula, Sardinia, and North Africa. [ 17–21 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to reconstruct the development of Phoenician metallurgy go back to the limited surveys of copper and iron production at Phoenician sites of the Iberian Peninsula, Sardinia, and North Africa. [17][18][19][20][21] Among the most important Phoenician colonies, Motya had a strategic position in the Central Mediterranean area as it connected the sea routes of the East regions with those of the West of the Mediterranean. Moreover, Motya was located along the commercial routes of central Italy and received goods from the Center Europe to the North Africa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%