1972
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80507-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential alteration of enzymes under hypobaria and hypoxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments described above show that tyrosine aminotransferase in the liver is induced on exposure of rats to low pressure and appears to be stabilized at a higher concentration on continued exposure. But this cannot be taken as a general stress response because other stress conditions such as hypoxia alone (Susheela et al, 1972) or shaking (Geller et al, 1964) did not bring about any change in the activity of this enzyme. Also, the nature of the change in the activity of this enzyme appears to differ from stress to stress, as discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments described above show that tyrosine aminotransferase in the liver is induced on exposure of rats to low pressure and appears to be stabilized at a higher concentration on continued exposure. But this cannot be taken as a general stress response because other stress conditions such as hypoxia alone (Susheela et al, 1972) or shaking (Geller et al, 1964) did not bring about any change in the activity of this enzyme. Also, the nature of the change in the activity of this enzyme appears to differ from stress to stress, as discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cortisol (Knox & Mehler, 1951), tryptophan (Knox, 1951), drugs (Ruddon & Cohen, 1970), toxins (Szot & Murphy, 1970), psychopharmacological compounds (Nomura, 1965), salicylate (Badawy & Smith, 1971) and ethanol (Badawy & Evans, 1973). A similar effect on tryptophan pyrrolase was obtained when the animals were subjected to conditions of stress, such as immobilization (Curzon & Green, 1969), cold exposure (Sitaramam & Ramasarma, 1975a) and hypobaria (Inamdar et al, 1972), but not hypoxia (Susheela et al, 1972). The nature of these stimulations falls essentially into three categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%