2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Association of 4E-BP2-Interacting Proteins Is Related to Selective Delayed Neuronal Death after Ischemia

Abstract: Cerebral ischemia induces an inhibition of protein synthesis and causes cell death and neuronal deficits. These deleterious effects do not occur in resilient areas of the brain, where protein synthesis is restored. In cellular stress conditions, as brain ischemia, translational repressors named eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) specifically bind to eIF4E and are critical in the translational control. We previously described that 4E-BP2 protein, highly expressed in brain, can be a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is established that the availability of eIF4E depending on the eIF4E/eIF4G association contributes to the progress of translation during cellular stress response. Thus, while the specific inhibition of eIF4E by eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) is a well-known control mechanism of translation inhibition, including cerebral ischemia [11,26,28,[39][40][41], the knowledge of eIF4G regulation is incomplete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is established that the availability of eIF4E depending on the eIF4E/eIF4G association contributes to the progress of translation during cellular stress response. Thus, while the specific inhibition of eIF4E by eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs) is a well-known control mechanism of translation inhibition, including cerebral ischemia [11,26,28,[39][40][41], the knowledge of eIF4G regulation is incomplete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 To reveal other potentially important proteins in this regulation, 4E-BP2–interacting proteins were identified by proteomics in the ischemia-resistant cortex and vulnerable hippocampus in sham and animals that underwent bilateral common carotid artery occlusion. 85 Interestingly, the 4E-BP2 interaction profile in the ischemia-resistant cortex compared with the susceptible hippocampus was already vastly different at baseline, which could explain differing vulnerabilities of these areas. Of note, HSC70, DRP2, α-enolase, UCH-L1, adenosine kinase-1, GAPDH, and phosphoglycerate kinase-1, maintained their region-specific interaction with 4E-BP2 after ischemia.…”
Section: Proteomics From Brain Tissue: In Search Of Disease Mechanism...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, HSC70, DRP2, α-enolase, UCH-L1, adenosine kinase-1, GAPDH, and phosphoglycerate kinase-1, maintained their region-specific interaction with 4E-BP2 after ischemia. 85 Although proteomic association studies led to the discovery of many potential new regulators of PKC, PPP1, and 4E-BP2, follow-up studies on the functional implications of modified interactions in the context of ischemia and preconditioning are lacking.…”
Section: Stroke and Neurocognitive Impairment Compendiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies by our group, we demonstrated that 4E-BP2 phosphorylation-or other post-translational modifications-is not the mechanism that operates on 4E-BP2 regulation under ischemiareperfusion stress, though it is the changes in the 4E-BP2-eIF4E association that have consequences on protein-synthesis recovery or inhibition in the resistant and vulnerable brain regions, respectively [20,21]. In our goal to determine whether the protein synthesis recovery in resistant areas could be dependent on specific modulators involved in the association/dissociation of 4E-BP2-eIF4E, using a proteomic approach we recently reported new 4E-BP2-interacting proteins, which has been the first described 4E-BP2 interactome in the cerebral cortex to date, and we compared it with that of the vulnerable CA1 region [22]. The study found seven 4E-BP2-interacting proteins with changes in their association between the resistant and vulnerable brain regions after IR (Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%