1999
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1999463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential atmospheric refraction in integral-field spectroscopy: Effects and correction

Abstract: Abstract. The basic concepts for determining the effect of differential atmospheric refraction on integral-field (twodimensional) spectroscopic observations are presented, and a method for correcting the spectra from this effect is given. The method is demonstrated with real data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of IFS data, the DAR can be corrected empirically, after the observations, without requiring to know the original orientation of the instrument and without the need of a compensator (Emsellem et al 1996;Arribas et al 1999;Roth et al 2004). To do so, the reconstructed datacubes are thought of as a set of narrow-band images with a band-width equal to the spectral resolution.…”
Section: Differential Atmospheric Refractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of IFS data, the DAR can be corrected empirically, after the observations, without requiring to know the original orientation of the instrument and without the need of a compensator (Emsellem et al 1996;Arribas et al 1999;Roth et al 2004). To do so, the reconstructed datacubes are thought of as a set of narrow-band images with a band-width equal to the spectral resolution.…”
Section: Differential Atmospheric Refractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained typical wavelength calibration errors of 0.1 8, which give velocity uncertainties of AE6 and AE4.5 km s À1 for [O iii] k5007 and H, respectively. We corrected the spectra for differential atmospheric refraction effects following the method proposed by Arribas et al (1999); the differential atmospheric refraction was estimated according to the model given by Allen (1973). In those cases in which the air mass was close to one, such correction was not necessary.…”
Section: Data Reduction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained typical wavelength calibration errors of 0.1Å, which give velocity uncertainties of ±6, and ±4.5 km s −1 for [O iii] λ5007 and Hα, respectively. We corrected the spectra for differential atmospheric refraction effects following the method proposed by Arribas et al (1999). To apply this method we used the atmospheric temperature and pressure given by the Carlsberg Meridian Circle Catalogue (1998) and we estimate the differential atmospheric refraction according to the model given by Allen (1973).…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%