2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02244-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential blood flow in uterine, ophthalmic, and brachial arteries of preeclamptic women*1

Abstract: Ultrasound evaluation of uterine and orbital circulation and flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery helps differentiate the degree and severity of preeclampsia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,8,19 However, when compared with other studies, the mean RI values in our series were similar to those described for women in the third trimester of pregnancy. 7,9,20 In our study, the mean PR was 0.58 6 0.10, which is very similar to values obtained in healthy young adult males 21 and in women more than 20 weeks pregnant. 22 Other studies have reported that no change occurs in the PR as gestation advances beyond 20 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…5,8,19 However, when compared with other studies, the mean RI values in our series were similar to those described for women in the third trimester of pregnancy. 7,9,20 In our study, the mean PR was 0.58 6 0.10, which is very similar to values obtained in healthy young adult males 21 and in women more than 20 weeks pregnant. 22 Other studies have reported that no change occurs in the PR as gestation advances beyond 20 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…27,28 The mean ophthalmic artery Doppler variables identified in this study are broadly in keeping with the reference ranges derived in healthy pregnant populations elsewhere. 21,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] A summary of the findings of these studies which report the means of key Doppler variables is presented in Table 6, alongside the findings of the present study for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Excluding one study that observed a very large effect 33 resulted in a slight reduction in the SMD (−1.20, 95% CI: −1.70, −0.70, p<0.001) and heterogeneity (Q=80.6, p<0.001, I 2 =86%). The magnitude of the overall effect was attenuated in sensitivity analyses of studies that excluded smokers (SMD: −1.30, 95% CI:−1.94, −0.66, p<0.001), 23, 30, 32, 3436, 3941 women with chronic hypertension (SMD: −1.15, 95% CI: −1.64, −0.66, p<0.001) 3032, 3640 or both (SMD: −1.30, 95% CI:−2.05, −0.55, p<0.001). 30, 32, 36, 39, 40 Selecting different time points for one study that included multiple time points 23 did not alter the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…FMD was significantly lower in women with less severe forms of preeclampsia 31, 34, 36, 37, 39 compared to women who had normotensive pregnancies (SMD: −0.95, 95% CI: −1.30, −0.59, p<0.001, Figure S2, Panel A). Similar results were observed in studies examining women with more severe forms of preeclampsia 31, 34, 36, 39 compared to women who had normotensive pregnancies (SMD: −1.74, 95% CI: −2.65, −0.83, p<0.001, Figure S2, Panel B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%