2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential colonization of microbial communities inhabiting Lede stone in the urban and rural environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By ensuring the locations are geographically distinct while maintaining a common climate and geochemistry, any species which were common to all samples would be regarded as the core microbiome for Lincolnshire limestone as opposed to being specific to one site. For example studies such as Schröer et al 25 , which looks at damaged Lede limestone in a Cfb climate, identified many species in common with this study such as A. agilis and A. tumbae which we are able to characterise as species common to both damaged and undamaged surfaces, as well as P. psychrosurans and C. flaccumfaciens, both of which have been demonstrated in this study to potentially enhance damage through high levels of biofilm formation. Differences between the species identified are therefore likely to relate to geochemistry of the stone 9 , 10 and pollution 27 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By ensuring the locations are geographically distinct while maintaining a common climate and geochemistry, any species which were common to all samples would be regarded as the core microbiome for Lincolnshire limestone as opposed to being specific to one site. For example studies such as Schröer et al 25 , which looks at damaged Lede limestone in a Cfb climate, identified many species in common with this study such as A. agilis and A. tumbae which we are able to characterise as species common to both damaged and undamaged surfaces, as well as P. psychrosurans and C. flaccumfaciens, both of which have been demonstrated in this study to potentially enhance damage through high levels of biofilm formation. Differences between the species identified are therefore likely to relate to geochemistry of the stone 9 , 10 and pollution 27 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Several species, such as M. luteus, P. sp. 1105 and P. psychrodurans, while found on both surfaces, were significantly more likely to be isolated from damaged stone which is supported by their discovery on damaged surfaces in studies such as Flores et al 53 , Schröer et al 25 and De leo et al 29 . The data from this present analysis has been made available as supplementary data to support future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2018). It is thus no surprising that stone communities yielded more diverse communities than soil and air and, indeed, its diversity indexes are also comparable with other subaerial biofilms growing on historical stones in temperate regions (Chimienti et al 2016;Li et al 2016;Schröer et al 2020). The bacterial communities in the three compartments are also different in terms of taxonomic composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The effect was small but mostly in agreement with past work from stones and soils. Biofouling Schröer et al, 2020;Tescari et al, 2018) and colonize the inner pore space as well. Biofilms in the field are often not as dense as those cultured for these experiments.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%