2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9031-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Daily Writing Contingencies and Performance on Major Multiple-Choice Exams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary purpose of this study was to determine if randomly selecting a few daily quizzes to credit would improve exam performance to the same degree as daily quizzes with all counting toward course credit. Hautau et al (2006b) previously concluded that writing for daily credit was superior to writing for random credit; however, this difference might have been attributable to the different reinforcement schedules or the different amounts of potential credit under the two contingencies. Current findings support the latter possibility: random writing credit can lead to exam performance statistically comparable to daily writing credit when the potential credit is equivalent under the two contingencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The primary purpose of this study was to determine if randomly selecting a few daily quizzes to credit would improve exam performance to the same degree as daily quizzes with all counting toward course credit. Hautau et al (2006b) previously concluded that writing for daily credit was superior to writing for random credit; however, this difference might have been attributable to the different reinforcement schedules or the different amounts of potential credit under the two contingencies. Current findings support the latter possibility: random writing credit can lead to exam performance statistically comparable to daily writing credit when the potential credit is equivalent under the two contingencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When credit on an intermittent schedule is sufficiently large, students will likely deem the quizzes to be important, keep up with assigned readings, and study for the quizzes, which will consequently contribute to exam performance. Hautau et al (2006b) showed that even a small amount of credit for quizzes leads to better exam performance than no credit awarded for quizzes. Therefore, although the students likely benefited from the WRSC condition, perhaps students worked even harder to prepare for the quizzes in the WRLC condition because each quiz potentially had greater impact on their grade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations