1999
DOI: 10.1177/002215549904700502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Distribution and Intracellular Targeting of mRNAs Corresponding to the Three Calmodulin Genes in Rat Brain: A Quantitative In Situ Hybridization Study

Abstract: SUMMARYTo investigate the pattern of expression of the three calmodulin (CaM) genes by in situ hybridization, gene-specific [ 35 S]-cRNA probes complementary to the multiple CaM mRNAs were hybridized in rat brain sections and subsequently detected by quantitative film or high-resolution nuclear emulsion autoradiography. A widespread and differential area-specific distribution of the CaM mRNAs was detected. The expression patterns corresponding to the three CaM genes differed most considerably in the olfactory … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hmax values calculated from the hybridized cRNA values measured in ISH experiments involving the use of radiolabeled riboprobes for CaM I, II, and III at medium concentration exhibited a good correlation with those obtained from saturation experiments. Hmax values expressed in cRNA ISH copy no/mm 2 units displayed a region-specific expression pattern characteristic of the multiple CaM genes in the rodent brain, as previously demonstrated (Solà et al 1996;Palfi et al 1999). …”
Section: Hmax Calculation Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hmax values calculated from the hybridized cRNA values measured in ISH experiments involving the use of radiolabeled riboprobes for CaM I, II, and III at medium concentration exhibited a good correlation with those obtained from saturation experiments. Hmax values expressed in cRNA ISH copy no/mm 2 units displayed a region-specific expression pattern characteristic of the multiple CaM genes in the rodent brain, as previously demonstrated (Solà et al 1996;Palfi et al 1999). …”
Section: Hmax Calculation Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The specificity of the CaM I, II, and III cRNA probes was verified previously by Northern blotting analysis (Palfi et al 1999). Hybridization with medium concentrations of sense probes resulted in very low labeling (see Figures 6D-6F).…”
Section: Control Experiments For In Situ Hybridizationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Indeed the promoters and 3 0 and 5 0 UTRs of the three genes are quite different suggesting divergent function. Studies of calmodulin expression in neurons and other systems suggest that indeed the three transcripts serve different functions and may code for different pools of calmodulin within the cell [32][33][34]. Western blot analysis simply looks at total calmodulin levels within the cells without regard for which transcript is predominant, or the sub-cellular localization of the protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, local CaM concentrations may also be translationally regulated as CaM mRNA is differentially distributed, a process that likely reflects the conservation of three non-allelic mammalian CaM genes encoding identical proteins but distinct 5Ј and 3Ј non-coding sequences. For example, one pool of CaM mRNA, derived from a specific CaM gene (CALM1) is abundant in the apical dendrites of cerebellar pyramidal cells and may give rise to local reservoirs of CaM; however, mRNAs derived from CALM1 and CALM2 genes are found in neurite outgrowths in nerve growth factor-stimulated PC12 cells, and CALM3-derived transcripts reside within the cell body (45)(46)(47). Base upon these factors, and the number and concentrations of CaM-binding proteins, it is possible that CaM availability is rate-limiting for SK channel surface expression (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%