2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during a verbal n-back task according to sensory modality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, WM cognitive strategies during N-back performance may be modality specific by age and level of WM load. It has been shown that there are different, as well as overlapping regions of activation when comparing auditory to visual WM tasks (Rodriguez-Jimenez et al, 2009). Although our N-back task stimulus is presented as a string of consonants, we don’t see a verbal WM association until the 2-back load in survivors ≥ 15 years old.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, WM cognitive strategies during N-back performance may be modality specific by age and level of WM load. It has been shown that there are different, as well as overlapping regions of activation when comparing auditory to visual WM tasks (Rodriguez-Jimenez et al, 2009). Although our N-back task stimulus is presented as a string of consonants, we don’t see a verbal WM association until the 2-back load in survivors ≥ 15 years old.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the DLPFC, and cingulate are important for verbal working memory functions in n-back tasks (Owen et al, 2005; Rodriguez-Jimenez et al, 2009), weaker brain response observed in these regions may suggest the VWM 2-back condition was more taxing for FHP youth than for their FHN peers. This idea is supported by the simple effects analysis, which indicated that in three of four areas of group difference in the frontal lobe, FHN youth showed significantly greater brain response in VWM versus vigilance, while FHP youth showed no difference in brain activity between these conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the task evolves and new items are presented, the subjects have to update the memorised string of n most recent items: they need to unbind the oldest item and bind the most recent one to a position in working memory. To correctly perform the n-back task participants have to hold and manipulate information between trials, hence strongly relying on executive control functions located in the prefrontal cortex (Kane, Conway, Miura, & Colflesh, 2007;Owen et al, 2005;Rodriguez-Jimenez et al, 2009). In this experiment the dual-task procedure required participants not only to respond to different stimuli (auditory and visual, as in Experiment 1) but also to maintain and update information from trial to trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%