2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2011.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of activating D1 and D2 receptors on electrophysiology of neostriatal neurons in a rat model of Parkinson's disease induced by paraquat and maneb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reasoning is consistent with Liang et al ( 2008 ) who reported that in awake MPTP-lesioned monkeys, L-dopa excited a subgroup of SPNs that were presumed to be dSPNs and inhibited a subgroup of SPNs that were presumed to be iSPNs (Liang et al, 2008 ). However, some anesthetized results show an increased activity of SPNs after DA depletion in rats reportedly reduced by D1 agonists, and increased further by D2 agonists (Tseng et al, 2004 ; Xu et al, 2011 ); such data complicates interpretations arising from the canonical model. Our data–especially given such low identified cell numbers–do not exclude the possibility that D1 agonist may decrease the activity of D1R-expressing (or D2R-expressing) SPNs; further research may shed more light here and somehow expand the scope of the canonical model (e.g., Cui et al, 2013 ; Sippy et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reasoning is consistent with Liang et al ( 2008 ) who reported that in awake MPTP-lesioned monkeys, L-dopa excited a subgroup of SPNs that were presumed to be dSPNs and inhibited a subgroup of SPNs that were presumed to be iSPNs (Liang et al, 2008 ). However, some anesthetized results show an increased activity of SPNs after DA depletion in rats reportedly reduced by D1 agonists, and increased further by D2 agonists (Tseng et al, 2004 ; Xu et al, 2011 ); such data complicates interpretations arising from the canonical model. Our data–especially given such low identified cell numbers–do not exclude the possibility that D1 agonist may decrease the activity of D1R-expressing (or D2R-expressing) SPNs; further research may shed more light here and somehow expand the scope of the canonical model (e.g., Cui et al, 2013 ; Sippy et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be the case that the population rate of fast‐spiking neurons is higher than that estimated by anatomical evidence, because the diameter of fast‐spiking neurons is slightly larger than that of MS neurons (17 μm vs. 13 μm; Kawaguchi, ). In the dorsal striatum, the firing frequency of the MS neurons is increased and decreased by D 1 ‐ and D 2 ‐like receptor agonists, respectively (Bamford et al, ; Xu et al, ). This idea may explain the underlying mechanisms of the present results of the divergent apomorphine‐induced effects on the PA neuronal activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic administration of SKF 38393 did not differ from SKF 81297 in terms of rescuing elecotrophysiological metrics after DA-depletion (Tseng et al, 2004), and it resulted homogeneously in increases (both in-\significant) having no obvious baseline correlation in WT animals. (Xu et al, 2011) (Results from these last two studies are also noteworthy for their opposing results when D1 agonist was given to DA deficient animals; Tseng et al, 2004 found that SKF-81297 decreased spiking, whereas Xu et al, 2011 found a statistically insignificant increase; thus expectations for Pitx3Null dorsal SPNs responses to D1 agonist are less clear. )…”
Section: D1 Agonist Skf 81297mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another example, strict application of SKF-81297 in a similar setting for dorsal striatum showed no obvious correlation with baseline for polarity or intensity. (Xu et al, 2011) Finally, Delfino et al, 2007, found that motor cortical activity was enhanced in hemi-lesioned rats having their BOLD response measured, suggesting that motor network glutamatergic striatal input plays a larger role in the D1 agonist response than in the l-DOPA response for WT. Thus expectations are that high-rate non-dorsal SPNs in WT may tend to decrease in rate albeit after drug during locomotor increases, significant or not, and any dorsal baseline correlation should be weak, if present at all.…”
Section: Genotype Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%