1996
DOI: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Effects of Anterior and Posterior Insular Cortex Lesions on the Acquisition of Conditioned Taste Aversion and Spatial Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings provide compelling evidence that the IC is not engaged uniquely in the (associative) learning and recognition of taste, but that it plays a more general role in recognition memory. Such findings fit well with recent findings of two brain imaging studies suggesting an involvement of the IC in human face and tactile recognition (Paller et al 2003;Reed et al 2004), as well as with evidence that reversible or permanent lesions of the IC produce strong impairments in the consolidation of inhibitory avoidance and watermaze spatial learning Nerad et al 1996).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings provide compelling evidence that the IC is not engaged uniquely in the (associative) learning and recognition of taste, but that it plays a more general role in recognition memory. Such findings fit well with recent findings of two brain imaging studies suggesting an involvement of the IC in human face and tactile recognition (Paller et al 2003;Reed et al 2004), as well as with evidence that reversible or permanent lesions of the IC produce strong impairments in the consolidation of inhibitory avoidance and watermaze spatial learning Nerad et al 1996).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings provide compelling evidence that the IC is not engaged uniquely in the (associative) learning and recognition of taste, but that it plays a more general role in recognition memory. Such findings fit well with recent findings of two brain imaging studies suggesting an involvement of the IC in human face and tactile recognition (Paller et al 2003;Reed et al 2004), as well as with evidence that reversible or permanent lesions of the IC produce strong impairments in the consolidation of inhibitory avoidance and watermaze spatial learning Nerad et al 1996).It is well established that a network of temporal structures including the perirhinal, parahippocampal, and entorhinal cortices and the hippocampus participates in recognition memory. Our results suggest that the IC is part of this network, as it is highly involved in processing the consolidation of newly presented tastes and, as the present findings indicate, of objects.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…2,18,21,22,25,27,30,36,37). This, coupled with the fact that previous studies (24,38) showed that neither damage to AI just caudal to GC nor to an area even more posterior in insular cortex than the hot spot identified here affected CTA, highlights the strong possibility that discrepancies across studies critically hinge upon the involvement of a specific area (or areas) of this cortical region. Especially considering that the lesion's impact on CTA expression was partial in the present study, it remains crucial to determine whether this relates more to the function of insular cortex in CTA (e.g., modulatory) and/ or if the region identified here collaborates with some or all of nearby GC and/or brain sites outside of insular cortex that remained unscathed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Electrophysiological recordings in the GC showed that some neurons vary their response pattern before and after CTA (19,32). Cortical lesions studies demonstrated that the insular cortex (that contains the GC) is important for CTA acquisition (11,33), although some particular insular lesions only partially disrupt CTA (34). However, the consensus is that GC is necessary for an effective acquisition of CTA (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%