2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of cocaine and ketamine on time estimation: Implications for neurobiological models of interval timing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
5
101
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This is unusual because previous studies have shown that a reduction in DRL efficiency is usually accompanied by an increase in burst responding, a pattern that can be induced by administration of psychostimulants (e.g., Cheng et al 2006a). The prevailing explanations for this pattern of responding are either that these drugs accelerated the speed of an internal clock and/or increased impulsivity, which in turn would decrease response efficiency (e.g., Meck 1996;Wiley et al 2000;McAuley et al 2006;Matell and Portugal 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3). This is unusual because previous studies have shown that a reduction in DRL efficiency is usually accompanied by an increase in burst responding, a pattern that can be induced by administration of psychostimulants (e.g., Cheng et al 2006a). The prevailing explanations for this pattern of responding are either that these drugs accelerated the speed of an internal clock and/or increased impulsivity, which in turn would decrease response efficiency (e.g., Meck 1996;Wiley et al 2000;McAuley et al 2006;Matell and Portugal 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The P-value was set at 0.05 for all statistical analyses. Finally, we used a sliding time-window method to determine the peak time of the IRT distribution for each rat as a function of sessions as previously described (e.g., Cheng et al 2006a). This method of identifying the peak time allowed us to infer when rats maximally expected reinforcement to occur.…”
Section: Data/statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, pharmacological tests using dopamine D1/D5 and D2/D3 receptor agonists show that the lack of d-opioid receptors in the Oprd1 2/2 mice modifies the D1/D5-nigral/D2/D3-pallidal balance in the striatum in favour of the nigral output [1]. Hence, the facilitated acquisition of striataldependent tasks observed in Oprd1 2/2 mice is likely the result of potentiated dopaminergic/glutaminergic activity in striatonigral pathways-possibly involving striatal cholinergic interneurons [13,84,90,91]. As a consequence, the inclusion of the Oprd1 2/2 mice in this study strengthens the argument for hippocampal-striatal interactions as the source of the proportional leftward shifts produced by DH lesions.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampal Lesions Differmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychoactive drugs that alter dopamine neurotransmission can also change the perception of time [39] in a manner that can be characterized as a change in the speed of a hypothetical internal clock. That is, immediately following systemic injections of dopaminergic agonists, the speed of the internal clock is relatively faster, thus leading to the experience of a longer subjective time for a given objective time [40]. In contrast, when synaptic dopamine levels are low, the speed of the internal clock is relatively slower and time seems to drag [41].…”
Section: Zebrafish Neuromodulatory Systems (A) Dopaminementioning
confidence: 99%