2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of deep brain stimulation on verbal fluency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
54
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
54
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirmed the findings of other research groups that VF declines in PD patients who undergo STN‐DBS, compared to PD patients who do not …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We confirmed the findings of other research groups that VF declines in PD patients who undergo STN‐DBS, compared to PD patients who do not …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We confirmed the findings of other research groups that VF declines in PD patients who undergo STN-DBS, compared to PD patients who do not. 3,4,7 VF decline is reportedly the most common type of executive cognitive decline post-DBS. [13][14][15][16] Marshall et al 17 found lower VF at 6 mo in a group of PD patients who underwent STN-DBS, compared to a control group that did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While an involvement of the precentral gyrus and the cerebellar cortex is in close relation to stimulation-induced deterioration of the speech motor system (Astrom et al, 2010;Mahlknecht et al, 2017), consequences of a modulation of prefrontal, parietal, and temporal cortex remain more speculative. However, there might be a relation to auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms, located in the posterior end of the planum temporale and the supramarginal gyrus (Tourville et al, 2008;Golfinopoulos et al, 2011;Guenther and Vladusich, 2012), and to executive control, as assessed by verbal fluency, which has been reported to deteriorate under DBS in essential tremor patients (Ehlen et al, 2014;Pedrosa et al, 2014).…”
Section: Modulation Of the Functional Connectome Of Speech Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%