2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-010-9559-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Effects of Malathion and Nitrate Exposure on American Toad and Wood Frog Tadpoles

Abstract: Organisms living in aquatic ecosystems are increasingly likely to be exposed to multiple pollutants at the same time due to the simultaneous use of several pesticides and fertilizers. We examined the single and interactive effects of environmentally realistic concentrations of nitrate and malathion on two species of tadpoles common in agricultural regions of the United States-the American Toad (Bufo americanus) and the Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica)-using a fully factorial mesocosm experiment that crossed four con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Highly productive wetlands are likely to provide abundant food supplies for frog larvae and adults, and some evidence suggests that eutrophication may increase tadpole growth in this way (Belden 2006;Johnson et al 2007). None of the wetlands had dissolved nitrogen (nitrate) levels sufficiently high to cause tadpole mortality or sublethal effects (Marco et al 1999;Camargo et al 2005;Krishnamurthy et al 2008;Smith et al 2011). All wetland nitrate concentrations observed in the present study were also below the recommended maximum value of 2.0 mg/L NO 3 -N for sensitive freshwater species (Camargo et al 2005).…”
Section: Influences On Wood Frog Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly productive wetlands are likely to provide abundant food supplies for frog larvae and adults, and some evidence suggests that eutrophication may increase tadpole growth in this way (Belden 2006;Johnson et al 2007). None of the wetlands had dissolved nitrogen (nitrate) levels sufficiently high to cause tadpole mortality or sublethal effects (Marco et al 1999;Camargo et al 2005;Krishnamurthy et al 2008;Smith et al 2011). All wetland nitrate concentrations observed in the present study were also below the recommended maximum value of 2.0 mg/L NO 3 -N for sensitive freshwater species (Camargo et al 2005).…”
Section: Influences On Wood Frog Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Organophosphate pesticides (e.g., malathion, methyl parathion) are known to cause negative effects on growth, development, metamorphosis and behaviour of the tadpoles. [6,[9][10][11][12][13]19,20] [21] and is widely considered as an ideal insecticide in agriculture. [22] Pyrethroids are highly toxic to non-target species including amphibians and produce negative effects on tadpoles and adult frogs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the low total concentrations of pesticides in these wetlands, it is unlikely Accepted Article that they alone are the sole factor in causing reduced tadpole mass. Mixtures of pesticides with other agricultural contaminants, like fertilizers, can have varying effects on tadpole growth (Relyea 2004;Mann et al 2009;Smith et al 2011). Further, there may be other factors contributing to the observed reduction in tadpole mass at wetlands with higher pesticide detections, including co-occurrence of unmeasured pesticides (e.g., glyphosate; Relyea 2005;Mann et al 2009) or eutrophication.…”
Section: Body Condition and Body Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pond‐breeding amphibians, natural processes that affect population growth rates are influential during the larval and juvenile stages and include factors such as predation, food quantity, water temperature, and the likelihood of the water body to desiccate prematurely (Semlitsch and Bridges 2005). The addition of anthropogenic habitat alteration and climate change puts greater stress on this life stage, when successful metamorphosis is critical to adult survival and fecundity (Relyea 2004; Smith et al 2011; Todd et al 2011). A primary threat to amphibians is pollution (Hopkins 2007; Wake and Vredenberg 2008; Lesbarrères et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%