1992
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199208000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of MK-801, NMDA and scopolamine on rats learning a four-member repeated acquisition paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted, relatively few multiple-component repeated-acquisition studies have used rats as subjects. Many studies of repeated acquisition in rats have adopted a simplified procedure (e.g., incremental repeated acquisition) that does not include an explicit performance component (Cohn & Cory-Slechta, 1992; Paule & McMillan, 1984; Winsauer, Bixler, & Mele, 1996) or that involves between-group comparison of acquisition and performance (Baron & Moerschbaecher, 1996). Our findings with PCP emphasize the importance of within-subject analyses that involve obtaining full dose–response functions for each subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted, relatively few multiple-component repeated-acquisition studies have used rats as subjects. Many studies of repeated acquisition in rats have adopted a simplified procedure (e.g., incremental repeated acquisition) that does not include an explicit performance component (Cohn & Cory-Slechta, 1992; Paule & McMillan, 1984; Winsauer, Bixler, & Mele, 1996) or that involves between-group comparison of acquisition and performance (Baron & Moerschbaecher, 1996). Our findings with PCP emphasize the importance of within-subject analyses that involve obtaining full dose–response functions for each subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we attempted to create NMDAR-associated learning deficits using MK-801, a high affinity noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist (Butelman, 1989; Shapiro and Caramanos, 1990), to determine whether preferentially inhibiting α5 subunit-containing GABA A (α 5 GABA A ) receptors would attenuate NMDA-mediated learning deficits. To test this hypothesis, we used an incremental repeated acquisition (IRA) task, which is NMDA-dependent (Cohn and Cory-Slechta, 1992), and allows for longitudinal assessment of within-subject drug effects (Bailey et al , 2010). The IRA is separated into a performance session, where the sequence of responses trained is always the same, and a learning session, where a different sequence of responses is trained each session.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%