Differential effects of out-of-home day care in improving child nutrition and augmenting maternal income among those with and without childcare support: A prospective before–after comparison study in Pokhara, Nepal
“…For example, the impact of daycare on maternal earnings was unclear [24,25], which is consistent with previous findings [6]. In addition to conflicting evidence on the relationship between daycare provision and maternal earnings, we found little evidence on the impact of daycare on maternal physical and mental health and social outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, four other studies [22][23][24][25] used observational design with more traditional regression adjustment. Deutsch and colleagues [22] and two studies from Hallman and Quisimbing and colleagues [23,25] used cross-sectional data and applied Heckman selection-type models to try and control for unmeasured characteristics of women who did vs. did not utilize daycare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies generally found limited evidence of impacts of daycare on maternal employment and earnings. Nakahara and colleagues [24] used a pre-post design based on measures collected while children were on waiting lists for daycare versus when they were attending daycare. They found that having a child in daycare did not increase the number of employed mothers or working hours, and had an unclear impact on wages (mean income increased, but median income decreased).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one of the studies in our review was randomized [11], but a number of other studies were quasi-experimental. Notably, the studies that used observational designs without any attempt to identify plausibly exogenous variation in program exposure [21][22][23][24][25] tended to find weaker evidence or null effects. But, as noted above, it may be difficult to detect the direction of bias, as we found evidence of both upward [19] and downward [20] bias in naive analyses among papers with quasi-experimental study designs.…”
Background Research from high-income countries suggests that increasing the availability of daycare can improve economic outcomes for mothers, but similar research from low-and middle-income countries is lacking.
“…For example, the impact of daycare on maternal earnings was unclear [24,25], which is consistent with previous findings [6]. In addition to conflicting evidence on the relationship between daycare provision and maternal earnings, we found little evidence on the impact of daycare on maternal physical and mental health and social outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, four other studies [22][23][24][25] used observational design with more traditional regression adjustment. Deutsch and colleagues [22] and two studies from Hallman and Quisimbing and colleagues [23,25] used cross-sectional data and applied Heckman selection-type models to try and control for unmeasured characteristics of women who did vs. did not utilize daycare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies generally found limited evidence of impacts of daycare on maternal employment and earnings. Nakahara and colleagues [24] used a pre-post design based on measures collected while children were on waiting lists for daycare versus when they were attending daycare. They found that having a child in daycare did not increase the number of employed mothers or working hours, and had an unclear impact on wages (mean income increased, but median income decreased).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one of the studies in our review was randomized [11], but a number of other studies were quasi-experimental. Notably, the studies that used observational designs without any attempt to identify plausibly exogenous variation in program exposure [21][22][23][24][25] tended to find weaker evidence or null effects. But, as noted above, it may be difficult to detect the direction of bias, as we found evidence of both upward [19] and downward [20] bias in naive analyses among papers with quasi-experimental study designs.…”
Background Research from high-income countries suggests that increasing the availability of daycare can improve economic outcomes for mothers, but similar research from low-and middle-income countries is lacking.
“…This is the approach adopted in many policy evaluation studies when the policy change a¤ects all …rms/individuals at the same time (e.g. Hat-ton, 2005;Nakahara et al, 2010;Narayana and Pengb, 2006;Rotte and Vogler, 1999 Assume the following general speci…cation of the dummy variable in the total costs function in (2):…”
Pressure on health care systems due to the increasing expenditures of the elderly population is pushing policy makers to adopt new regulation and payment schemes for nursing home services. We consider the behavior of nonpro…t nursing homes under di¤erent payment schemes and empirically investigate the implications of prospective payments on nursing home costs under tightly regulated quality aspects. To evaluate the impact of the policy change introduced in 2006 in Southern Switzerland -from retrospective to prospective payment -we use a panel of 41 homes observed over a 10-years period (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). We employ a …xed e¤ects model with a time trend that is allowed to change after the policy reform. There is evidence that the new payment system slightly reduces costs without impacting quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.