1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(96)00016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of partial spikelet removal and defoliation on kernel growth and assimilate partitioning among wheat cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
35
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results support the supposal, with GFR, FGP and grain weight of inferior florets being increased greatly by removing some florets, while decreased markedly by reducing source (leaf-cutting). However, for the loose-panicle variety Xiushui 11, floret-removal and leaf-cutting treatments caused little change of inferior florets in grain filling rate and final grain weight relative to the control, which was different to the previous reports (Simmons et al 1982;Ma et al 1996;Kato 2004) that alternation of source/sink ratio had a dramatic influence on grain filling rate and final grain weight of inferior florets. Obviously, the genotypic difference in the effect of source/ratio changing on the development of inferior florets in rice panicle may be attributable to the different panicle type or structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The current results support the supposal, with GFR, FGP and grain weight of inferior florets being increased greatly by removing some florets, while decreased markedly by reducing source (leaf-cutting). However, for the loose-panicle variety Xiushui 11, floret-removal and leaf-cutting treatments caused little change of inferior florets in grain filling rate and final grain weight relative to the control, which was different to the previous reports (Simmons et al 1982;Ma et al 1996;Kato 2004) that alternation of source/sink ratio had a dramatic influence on grain filling rate and final grain weight of inferior florets. Obviously, the genotypic difference in the effect of source/ratio changing on the development of inferior florets in rice panicle may be attributable to the different panicle type or structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Pearson et al (1996b) observed that the depletion of sucrose in the cultured ears of wheat through maintaining them in the dark decreased the transport of Zn to the grain, perhaps as a result of a decrease in mass flow of carbohydrates within the phloem. Due to the limitation of the grain sink capacity, sucrose at high supply rates may be accumulated in the peduncle and chaff, resulting in stomatal closure, the abatement of transportation by the xylem, and finally a decreased accumulation of micronutrients (including Zn) in grains (Ma et al, 1996). Recent studies showed the grain Zn concentration significantly decreased with increasing sucrose supply to detached ears, due to a dilution effect resulting from the increase in grain weight (Zhang et al, 2012a;Liu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al (1996) and Wang et al (1997) investigated the source-sink limitation for wheat grain growth by partial spikelet removal and defoliation. In their experiments, partial spikelet removal reduced the grain number and total sink size, and increased the source-to-sink ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown some degree of control over grain N by intrinsic grain characteristics for wheat (Triticum aestivum; Borghi et al, 1986), barley (Hordeum vulgare;Mattsson et al, 1993), and maize (Zea mays; Wyss et al, 1991). Although others have shown control of grain N accumulation by the level of N supply for wheat (Barlow et al, 1983; Barneix and Guitman, 1993;Ma et al, 1995Ma et al, , 1996, barley (Dreccer et al, 1997; Voltas and Araus, 1997), maize (Wyss et al., 1991), pea (Pisum sativum; Lhuillier-Soundele et al, 1999a, 1999b, and soybean (Glycine max; Saravitz and Raper, 1995;Nakasathien et al, 2000). Comparison of the capacity of in vitro-cultured grains or seeds from low-and high-protein genotypes of wheat (Donovan et al, 1977), maize (Wyss et al, 1991), and soybean (Hayati et al, 1996) to accumulate N has led to the conclusion that genetic differences in grain or seed N content and concentration are caused, at least * Corresponding author; e-mail pmartre@clermont.inra.fr; fax 33-473-624 -457.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%