2005
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.80674-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of R5 and X4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection on CD4+ cell proliferation and activation

Abstract: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates can be distinguished by their chemokine coreceptor usage. Non-syncytium-inducing (NSI), macrophage-tropic viruses utilize CCR5 and are called R5 viruses; syncytium-inducing (SI) isolates use CXCR4 and are known as X4 viruses. R5 and X4 HIV isolates are both transmitted but, in most cases, R5 viruses predominate in the blood prior to the development of AIDS-related pathogenesis. The reason for the selective growth of the R5 strain is not known, but could refl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we have found that in HIV + individuals the level of CCR5 expression is highly correlated with the degree of T cell activation (our unpublished data), which is consistent with the preferential expression of CCR5 in activated CD4 + T cells from these patients (88). Finally, the fact that HIV R5 but not X4 strains induce increased T cell activation favoring HIV survival and spread (89) further supports a role for CCR5-mediated T cell costimulation in HIV pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Second, we have found that in HIV + individuals the level of CCR5 expression is highly correlated with the degree of T cell activation (our unpublished data), which is consistent with the preferential expression of CCR5 in activated CD4 + T cells from these patients (88). Finally, the fact that HIV R5 but not X4 strains induce increased T cell activation favoring HIV survival and spread (89) further supports a role for CCR5-mediated T cell costimulation in HIV pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Experimental evidence suggest several possibilities to account for this observation: (i) chronic expansion of Treg in vivo results in low levels of CD25 expression, retaining their suppressive activity, as previously reported in a murine model [35]; this constant expansion (high Treg frequency) is observed also in GALT from HIV infected patients [5, 30]; (ii) it might reflect internalization of the CD25 molecule after IL-2 binding [36]; in fact, the expansion of CD4 + CD25 lo CD127 lo Foxp3 + Treg is one of the long-term effects of IL-2 therapy in HIV patients [37, 38]; (iii) in vitro assays have shown that HIV induces down regulation of the CD25 molecule in CD4 + infected cells [39]. In addition, HIV viral proteins are involved in this process, inhibiting IL-2R expression; HIV p29 protein induces a two fold increase in the intracellular cyclic adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate (cAMP) in PBMC which is associated with the decrease of CD25 [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the major HIV antigen gp120 [114] and mycobacterial compounds such as glycolipids of the cell wall, particularly LAMs, PIMs, and phenolic glycolipids [115], play a crucial role in modulating immune responses. It is also increasingly apparent that these compounds may differ in biologic activity depending on strain lineages of the two pathogens [53], [115], [116].…”
Section: Summary and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%