2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01990-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of radiation fractionation regimens on glioblastoma

Abstract: Background Radiotherapy (RT) is a mainstay of treatment for patients with glioblastoma (GB). Early clinical trials show that short course hypofractionation showed no survival benefit compared to conventional regimens with or without temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZ) but reduces the number of doses required. Concerns around delayed neurological deficits and reduced cognition from short course hypofractionated RT remain a concern. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increased interf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding biological effects of exposure to ionizing radiation, most studies either utilize a single-irradiation dose or focus on fractionated irradiation, applying more fractions over a short time period, to establish surviving/resistant cell lines ( 35 ). Direct radiobiological comparison of fractionation regimens, for instance, in non-small cell lung cancer or glioblastoma cell models reflects the clinical situation with some advantages of hypofractionation for tumor control with no observed increase in radiotoxicity ( 36 , 37 ). However, there is some evidence that hypofractionated radiotherapy can play a significant role in radioresistance and tumor recurrence and there is a need to optimize radiotherapy strategies, since different sites and types of tumors may respond differently to the same dose and fractionated irradiation ( 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding biological effects of exposure to ionizing radiation, most studies either utilize a single-irradiation dose or focus on fractionated irradiation, applying more fractions over a short time period, to establish surviving/resistant cell lines ( 35 ). Direct radiobiological comparison of fractionation regimens, for instance, in non-small cell lung cancer or glioblastoma cell models reflects the clinical situation with some advantages of hypofractionation for tumor control with no observed increase in radiotoxicity ( 36 , 37 ). However, there is some evidence that hypofractionated radiotherapy can play a significant role in radioresistance and tumor recurrence and there is a need to optimize radiotherapy strategies, since different sites and types of tumors may respond differently to the same dose and fractionated irradiation ( 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, an explanation of the difference that might be observed in the clinic is based on the clinical use of fractionated radiation, in comparison to a single dose. This recently led to the proposal to use hyofractionated radiotherapy regimens, with sufficient spacing to avoid the differential outcomes in cell stress responses to therapy [ 58 ], and/or the use of pro-apoptotic compounds to enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy [ 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After treatment, cells were harvested, washed with 1X PBS, fixed with 1 mL of ice-cold 70% ethanol and stored at −20 °C overnight. The fixed cells were stained and analysed using the MUSE ® Cell Cycle Kit and the MUSE ® Cell Analyser following the manufacturer’s instructions [ 26 ]. The percentage of cells in G0/G1, S and G2/M phases was assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%