2003
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000067995.13410.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of surgical sympathetic block on sudomotor and vasoconstrictor function

Abstract: T2 sympathectomy leads to long-lasting inhibition of palmar sweating, which does not correlate to loss of vasoconstriction. Recurrent and enhanced vasoconstrictor function 3 months following endoscopic sympathetic block has major implications for its use to treat enhanced vasoconstriction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rewarming kinetics of the hands has been successfully used to assess the effects of surgical sympathetic block previously [19].We confirmed that the main effect of the ESB is observed in the fingertips, as would be expected according to the rich vasoconstrictory innervation of the arterio-venous shunts in the fingertips [6,12]. ESB at the level of T4 was by far less effective in suppressing vasoconstrictor outflow and also in reducing palmar sweating as compared to ESB at T2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Rewarming kinetics of the hands has been successfully used to assess the effects of surgical sympathetic block previously [19].We confirmed that the main effect of the ESB is observed in the fingertips, as would be expected according to the rich vasoconstrictory innervation of the arterio-venous shunts in the fingertips [6,12]. ESB at the level of T4 was by far less effective in suppressing vasoconstrictor outflow and also in reducing palmar sweating as compared to ESB at T2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Rewarming kinetics of the hands have been successfully used to assess the effects of surgical sympathetic block in the past [20]. In our study we observed that the inhibition of vasoconstriction was more pronounced following ESB at level T2 as compared to T3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Rewarming was recorded for another 9 minutes. Time course of rewarming was analyzed offline separately for six circular areas (diameter 5 mm) spaced by 1.5 cm from the fingertip of the middle finger to the center of the palm [20] for both hands by dedicated software [11]. In all patients, the test was performed one to two days before, two days after and three months after ESB.…”
Section: Methods S Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, Freedman et al (2005) showed that despite an B21C difference in skin temperature across 18-301C T A conditions in humans, (7)MDMA induced changes in the temperature of skin and core of approximately the same magnitude. Human peripheral thermoregulation by vasodilation/vasoconstriction and sweating appears to be independently mediated (Inoue et al, 1998;Schick et al, 2003). Freedman and colleagues found that sweating onset in humans is at a core temperature of 35.51C and a skin temperature of 371C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%