Differential Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Depending on Previous Musical Training

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) facilitates motor performance, but individual differences such as baseline performance seem to influence this effect. Accordingly, musicians offer an inter-individual differences model due to anatomical and functional variances displayed among the motor cortex regions. The aim of the present work was to study if the baseline motor skill predicts whether tDCS can enhance motor learning. For that objective, we administered anodal (n = 20) or sham (n = 20) tDCS on the right primary motor cortex region of 40 right-handed healthy participants, who were divided into four groups: musicians (tDCS/sham) and non-musicians (tDCS/sham). We measured the skill index (SI) presented in the sequential finger-tapping task (SEQTAP) at baseline, during three 20 min/2 mA stimulation sessions, and in follow-up tests after 20 min and 8 days. Depending on the normality of the data distribution, statistical differences were estimated by ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test or Kruskal–Wallis and U Mann–Whitney. Results showed that musicians scored higher in baseline performance than non-musicians. The non-musicians who received tDCS scored higher than the sham group in the first and second stimulation session. This effect was extended to the 20 min and 8 days follow-up test. In musicians, there was no effect of tDCS. The present method seems to be suitable for the achievement of positive and consolidated tDCS effects on motor learning in inexperienced participants, but not in musicians. These data may have an implication for the rehabilitation of motor impairments, contributing to more individualized stimulation protocols.

Multitasking and Time Pressure in the Operating Room

“…In a recent meta-analysis, tDCS was found to improve reaction time, execution time and force of contraction during upper limb motor performance. 41 In the wider community, tDCS has been investigated for its potential to enhance performance in fields such as sports 42 and music 43 , and mitigate the detrimental effects of sustained attention on performance by modulating prefrontal activity and increasing the availability of attentional resources. 44 Biofeedback is the process of measuring surrogate markers of arousal (e.g.…”

Spontaneous slow oscillation—slow spindle features predict induced overnight memory retention

“…During sleep anodal slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS; oscillating at ~0.75 Hz) targets the ongoing SO and associated thalamo-cortical network activity [ 50 , 51 ], enhancing SO, spindle activity and improving declarative memory consolidation [ 52–54 ]. Yet, many results with noninvasive brain stimulation results revealed poor reproducibility [ 55–58 ], possibly attributed to pronounced variations in individual network susceptibility and/or electric field distribution [ 59–62 ]. In a previous study of ours, differential effects on sleep associated memory retention of weak exogenous electric stimulation (so-tDCS) correlated with subjects’ memory quotient, an index that indicates one´s memory capacity [ 60 ].…”

A randomized controlled trial to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on patients with post-stroke fatigue

“…And the mechanism may be related to the increase of monoamine neurotransmitters in related brain regions. Other studies [ 41 ] have shown that tDCS can also decrease the activity of GABA, increase the level of intracellular Ca 2+ and change the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). This may be one of the ways tDCS works in PSF.…”