2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-020-00658-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential effects of wetting and drying on soil CO2 concentration and flux in near-surface vs. deep soil layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a consistent positive effect of assay temperature on soil respiration within and across chronosequences. Such results agree with previous literature addressing the effects of temperature on soil organic matter decomposition and soil respiration rates Kirschbaum, 2006;Lloyd & Taylor, 1994;Min et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We observed a consistent positive effect of assay temperature on soil respiration within and across chronosequences. Such results agree with previous literature addressing the effects of temperature on soil organic matter decomposition and soil respiration rates Kirschbaum, 2006;Lloyd & Taylor, 1994;Min et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4). Our results are in line with recent findings that microbial C transformations and associated CO2 fluxes in deep soils (70 cm) are substantial (Min et al, 2020), microbial activities below 30 cm can be as high (Jones et al, 2018) or higher (Stone et al, 2014) than those at the surface. Also, a recent study revealed that root exudates from switchgrass enhanced microbial production of extracellular polymeric substances and soil C stability along 120 cm of soil profiles (Sher et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, most soil C dynamics research so far has focused on the top 30 cm of soil, where soil C concentrations are highest (Jobbágy and Jackson, 2000; Kögel-Knabner et al, 2008). Recent studies highlight that surface soil (< 30 cm) and deep soil (> 30 cm) C pools respond differently to changes in environmental conditions (Berhe et al, 2008; Fierer et al, 2003a; Jia et al, 2019; Min et al, 2020; Pries et al, 2017). At the surface, variation in abiotic factors such as temperature and moisture can influence microbial transformation of soil organic C. However, in deeper soil layers, relatively constant environmental conditions, increased mineral interactions, and lower microbial biomass, combined with distinct microbial community composition, may alter the capacity for microbial C transformation relative to the surface (Rumpel et al, 2012; Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these high frequency measurements of the soil CO 2 concentration, a hysteresis loop was found when plotting the CO 2 concentration as a function of the soil temperature in a high-altitudinal, semi-arid forest soil (Riveros-Iregui et al 2007). A very similar relationship between soil CO 2 concentration and soil temperature was also observed in a temperate pine plantation (Zhang et al 2015) and Mediterranean cropland soils (Min et al 2020). In addition, several authors reported a hysteresis loop when plotting the CO 2 efflux as a function of soil temperature (Parkin and Kaspar 2003;Gaumont-Guay et al 2006;Ruehr et al 2010;Jia et al 2013;Wang et al 2014;Song et al 2015;Zhang et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%