1982
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90595-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential enhancement of behavioral sensitivity to apomorphine following chronic treatment of rats with (−)-sulpiride and haloperidol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has shown that withdrawal from chronic antipsychotic treatment leads to a supersensitive psychomotor response to dopamine agonists (Gianutsos et al, 1974;Sayers et al, 1975;Davis, 1975, 1976;Clow et al, 1979;Montanaro et al, 1982;Rebec et al, 1982;Meng et al, 1998). We show here that behavioral dopamine supersensitivity is not just evident on withdrawal, but develops early during antipsychotic exposure and significantly undermines the efficacy of ongoing treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work has shown that withdrawal from chronic antipsychotic treatment leads to a supersensitive psychomotor response to dopamine agonists (Gianutsos et al, 1974;Sayers et al, 1975;Davis, 1975, 1976;Clow et al, 1979;Montanaro et al, 1982;Rebec et al, 1982;Meng et al, 1998). We show here that behavioral dopamine supersensitivity is not just evident on withdrawal, but develops early during antipsychotic exposure and significantly undermines the efficacy of ongoing treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In humans, this has been termed "neuroleptic-induced supersensitivity psychosis" (Chouinard et al, 1978;Chouinard and Jones, 1980), and has been observed after withdrawal from antipsychotic drugs such as quetiapine (Margolese et al, 2002), clozapine (Ekblom et al, 1984;Tollefson et al, 1999), olanzapine (Llorca et al, 2001), haloperidol (Kahne, 1989), and fluphenazine enanthate (Chouinard and Jones, 1980). In keeping with the clinical observations, animal studies show that withdrawal from antipsychotic treatment reveals an increased psychomotor response to apomorphine (Asper et al, 1973;Gianutsos et al, 1974;Sayers et al, 1975;Davis, 1975, 1976;Clow et al, 1979;Montanaro et al, 1982), amphetamine (Smith and Davis, 1975;Rebec et al, 1982;Meng et al, 1998), and dopamine injected into the caudate-putamen or nucleus accumbens (Halperin et al, 1983). Although such studies have conclusively demonstrated dopamine supersensitivity after withdrawal from an antipsychotic, much less is known about what happens during ongoing treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This work shows that when using the same achieved dose, peak level of D 2 receptor occupancy, route, and duration of treatment, continuous antipsychotic treatment/D 2 receptor blockade (as achieved via subcutaneous osmotic minipump) favors dopamine supersensitivity, while intermittent treatment/D 2 receptor blockade (via daily subcutaneous injection) does not [9,11,154]. There are reports that intermittent antipsychotic administration via daily subcutaneous injection can produce dopamine supersensitivity [155,156,157,158]. However, the antipsychotic doses used are quite large and would produce excessively high and clinically unrepresentative levels of striatal D 2 receptor blockade [159].…”
Section: Guidelines For Sp and Td Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that DA supersensitivity underlies the relapse of psychotic symptoms following discontinuation of treatment or dose reduction, which may include the appearance of new or more severe psychotic symptoms [18,19]. In animal models, increased striatal D 2 receptor density is associated with an increased locomotor response to amphetamine and DA agonists following withdrawal from repeated APD administration [20][21][22][23]. Although numerous studies have associated the emergence of DA supersensitivity to increased D 2 receptor density, the nature of the relationship is not clearly understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%