1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002030050778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential enumeration and in situ localization of microorganisms in the hindgut of the lower termite Mastotermes darwiniensis by hybridization with rRNA-targeted probes

Abstract: We examined the abundance and spatial distribution of major phylogenetic groups of the domain Bacteria in hindguts of the Australian lower termite Mastotermes darwiniensis by using in situ hybridization with group-specific, fluorescently labeled, rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Between 32.0 +/- 7.2% and 52.3 +/- 8.2% of the DAPI-stained cells in different hindgut fractions were detected with probe EUB338, specific for members of the domain Bacteria. About 85% of the prokaryotic cells were associated with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diverse microbes attached to the surface of, or resident in the cytoplasm of, protozoa may compose a large fraction of the total gut bacterial load, considering that protozoa dominate up to 90% of the hindgut volume of lower termites (21). Previous studies have proposed roles for these bacteria (26,(30)(31)(32), but the challenges faced when studying their physiology in vitro or in situ makes many proposed interactions only speculative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diverse microbes attached to the surface of, or resident in the cytoplasm of, protozoa may compose a large fraction of the total gut bacterial load, considering that protozoa dominate up to 90% of the hindgut volume of lower termites (21). Previous studies have proposed roles for these bacteria (26,(30)(31)(32), but the challenges faced when studying their physiology in vitro or in situ makes many proposed interactions only speculative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ZnD2sec FDH gene accounted for 64% of the fdhF Sec clones in the resulting libraries from total gut DNA, implying that it is perhaps the most abundant fdhF Sec -encoding member of the community. However, termite gut bacteria are known to strongly attach to the gut wall (21,22) and to associate with the surfaces or insides of gut protozoa (23), in addition to being free-swimming. Through the microfluidic device loading method, larger wood particles, protozoal particles, gut epithelial tissues, and other aggregates were routinely excluded from our initial microfluidic protocols, to prevent channel clogging in the device.…”
Section: Microfluidic Digital Pcr Identifies Termite Gut Spirochetes mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using rRNA-based techniques such as rRNA gene clone sequencing, 5) terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms (T-RFLP) analysis, 6) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) 7) have shown that the termite gut is a rich reservoir of novel and diverse microorganisms, and highly compartmentalized beyond our expectations, and have also indicated that our knowledge of the relevant ecosystem is still insufficient for comprehensive understanding of this symbiosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] A dense colonization of bacteria as well as methanogenic archaea is observed on the gut epithelium (simply, the gut wall). [15][16][17][18] In our recent report, 19) we investigated the spatial distribution of gut bacteria in the termite Reticulitermes speratus (Rhinotermitidae), particularly focusing on the bacteria resident on the gut wall, to demonstrate that the bacteria on the gut wall are more diverse than those in the gut lumen. As clearly shown in methanogens 18) and bacteria, 19,20) species inhabiting the gut wall are phylogenetically distinct from the other microhabitats of the gut.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%