2011
DOI: 10.15676/ijeei.2011.3.1.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Evolution based Multi-objective Optimization of a Deregulated Power Network under Contingent State

Abstract: This paper proposes a methodology to limit the variations in generation cost in a power system under normal and contingent state using Differential Evolution (DE) optimization technique keeping consumer welfare in view. The aim of this proposed methodology is to minimize the deviations of generation cost, during contingency, from a preferred value by rescheduling of the generation with a controlled load curtailment technique and hence relieving the lines from overloading for congestion management. A comparativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuel cost ($/h) MATPOWER (Zimmerman et al, 2011) 802.20 GA (Devaraj and Yegnanarayana, 2005) 803.05 EP (Somasundaram et al, 2004) 802.4 GA (Narmatha Banu and Devaraj, 2009) 801.7165 DE (Sen et al, 2011) 801.8436 PSO (Sen et al, 2011) 801.8441 PSO (Ahmed et al, 2014) 801.6954 GA (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 801.96 GA fuzzy (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 801.21 PSO (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 800.96 FPSO (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 800.72 ABC (Rezaei Adaryani and Karmi, 2013) TCSC is included in addition to generation rescheduling to alleviate the line overloads due to line outage 2-5. The LOSI values are calculated using Equation (1) for each branch of the considered system for the selected contingency cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuel cost ($/h) MATPOWER (Zimmerman et al, 2011) 802.20 GA (Devaraj and Yegnanarayana, 2005) 803.05 EP (Somasundaram et al, 2004) 802.4 GA (Narmatha Banu and Devaraj, 2009) 801.7165 DE (Sen et al, 2011) 801.8436 PSO (Sen et al, 2011) 801.8441 PSO (Ahmed et al, 2014) 801.6954 GA (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 801.96 GA fuzzy (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 801.21 PSO (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 800.96 FPSO (Kumar and Chaturvedi, 2013) 800.72 ABC (Rezaei Adaryani and Karmi, 2013) TCSC is included in addition to generation rescheduling to alleviate the line overloads due to line outage 2-5. The LOSI values are calculated using Equation (1) for each branch of the considered system for the selected contingency cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of this unavoidable situation may be quite severe as it can cause power flow congestion in the line. Transmission lines have thermal limit of carrying power and if the power flow exceeds that limit, which is quite expected during contingency, the line is said to be congested (Sen S., 2011). To avoid such congestion issues preliminary approach is presented of contingency analysis using linear sensitivity factors for realizing congestion in proposed system.…”
Section: Congestion Management Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%