2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Evolution for learning the classification method PROAFTN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first study compares the performance of PSOPRO against the previous work applied on PROAFTN method [1,2,3]. Secondly, further experimental work was conducted with six machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first study compares the performance of PSOPRO against the previous work applied on PROAFTN method [1,2,3]. Secondly, further experimental work was conducted with six machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 documents the performance of PSOPRO against the previous work done on PROAFTN. In this regards, DEPRO is the abbreviation of using Differential Evolution for learning PROAFTN which has been explained in [3]. The term PSOPRO-RVNS represents the utilization of PSO and Reduced Variable Neighborhood Search (RVNS) for learning PROAFTN, more details are explained in [1,2].…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then they showed in a second study [10] that their method based on genetic algorithm gives better performance than the AHP method. Al-Obeidat et al [1] proposed an hybrid model which combine Differential Evolution method with the PROAFTN method, by using the evolutionary algorithm to inductively obtain PROAFTN's parameters from data to achieve a high classification accuracy. Liu et al [21] combined the methods of Electre III and the simulating annealing to deal with the compensatory effect of the items against criteria and opted for grouping criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%