2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11557.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential evolution of the UV luminosity function of Lyman break galaxies from z ∼ 5 to 3*

Abstract: We report the ultraviolet luminosity function (UVLF) of Lyman break galaxies at z∼ 5 derived from a deep and wide survey using the prime focus camera of the 8.2 m Subaru telescope (Suprime‐Cam). Target fields consist of two blank regions of the sky, namely, the region including the Hubble Deep Field‐North and the J0053+1234 region, and the total effective surveyed area is 1290 arcmin2. Applications of carefully determined colour selection criteria in V−Ic and Ic−z′ yield a detection of 853 z∼ 5 candidates with… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
172
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(317 reference statements)
16
172
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors (Sawicki & Thompson 2006;Iwata et al 2007) have argued that the most significant evolution in the UV LF happens at the faint end, others (Yoshida et al 2006;Bouwens et al , 2007 find that the most significant evolution is at the bright end, while Beckwith et al (2006) claim that the evolution is similar at the bright and faint ends. Other authors suggest compensating evolutions in LBG number density and characteristic luminosity, resulting in a nearly constant UV luminosity density Giavalisco et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (Sawicki & Thompson 2006;Iwata et al 2007) have argued that the most significant evolution in the UV LF happens at the faint end, others (Yoshida et al 2006;Bouwens et al , 2007 find that the most significant evolution is at the bright end, while Beckwith et al (2006) claim that the evolution is similar at the bright and faint ends. Other authors suggest compensating evolutions in LBG number density and characteristic luminosity, resulting in a nearly constant UV luminosity density Giavalisco et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 5, we note the following. Some authors do not take into account the role of cosmic variance (e.g., Schiminovich et al 2005;Wilson et al 2002;Iwata et al 2007); or consider it negligible with respect to statistical uncertainties (e.g., Paltani et al 2007); or consider it negligible because of the large volume explored (e.g., van der Burg et al 2010, 4 deg 2 ); or mitigate its effects using several fields in different lines of sights, although generally these fields are much smaller than the VVDS2h field (e.g., Steidel et al 1999;Reddy & Steidel 2009); or the cosmic variance has been included as uncertainty in the LF normalisation (e.g., Bouwens et al 2007). We choose to compute it with the most conservative method (see above) and to include it in our comprehensive uncertainty on the LD.…”
Section: The Vvds Fuv Comoving Luminosity Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At z ∼ 5, Iwata et al (2007) reported the UV LF from a combination of HDF and Subaru images, totalling a survey area about 1/9 of ours. Oesch et al (2007) based their study on approximately 100 LBGs from very deep ACS and NICMOS imaging.…”
Section: Comparison At Z =mentioning
confidence: 99%