2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-018-9395-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential evolution with the adaptive penalty method for structural multi-objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DE algorithm ranked first in both CEC2006 [43] and CEC2010 [44] constrained optimization competitions. The DE algorithm with an adaptive penalty function is proved to be able to solve the high-dimensional COP problem in engineering stably, such as [45][46][47]. Thus, the DE algorithm is used to solve the problem of capacity allocation.…”
Section: Differential Evolution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DE algorithm ranked first in both CEC2006 [43] and CEC2010 [44] constrained optimization competitions. The DE algorithm with an adaptive penalty function is proved to be able to solve the high-dimensional COP problem in engineering stably, such as [45][46][47]. Thus, the DE algorithm is used to solve the problem of capacity allocation.…”
Section: Differential Evolution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The improved versions of the standard metaheuristic algorithms have also come in sight over time to dispose the algorithmic shortcomings of standard ones, recently. [24][25][26][27] As instances from the current ones; for structural engineering field four modified versions of standard grasshopper optimization algorithm to solve large-scale real-size complex both truss and frame type steel structures are proposed, 28 the differential evolution with adaptive penalty method is used for structural multi-objective optimization, 29 the five different trusses are optimized via craziness based particle swarm optimization (CRPSO), which is an adaptive version of the particle swarm optimization (PSO), 30 and so forth. Furthermore, a developed metaheuristic algorithm may give very successful results in one design field, but may not show enough optimal solution performance in another design field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ideia principal é fazer com que o valor dos coeficientes de penalização sejam distribuídos de tal forma que as restrições mais difíceis de serem atendidas sejam penalizadas mais fortemente. Trabalhos como [6] e [7], nos quais a técnica APM foi aplicada com sucesso no tratamento de restrições de problemas de otimização, principalmente em problemas do mundo real, podem ser encontrados na literatura.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified