2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316059110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential expression of olfactory genes in the southern house mosquito and insights into unique odorant receptor gene isoforms

Abstract: The southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, has one of the most acute and eclectic olfactory systems of all mosquito species hitherto studied. Here, we used Illumina sequencing to identify olfactory genes expressed predominantly in antenna, mosquito's main olfactory organ. Less than 50% of the trimmed reads generated by high-quality libraries aligned to a transcript, but approximately 70% of them aligned to the genome. Differential expression analysis, which was validated by quantitative realtime PCR … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
105
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore surmised that DEET must be detected by highly expressed odorant receptors (ORs) given that only a very small fraction of molecules released in the air would reach neurons housed in antennal sensilla (13). Two out of the top 10 putative OR genes enriched in female antennae compared with control tissues (14), CquiOR21 (formerly CquiOR10) (15) and CquiOR95 (14), have already been deorphanized, and one putative OR, CquiOR36, is probably a pseudogene. We cloned the other seven putative ORs, CquiOR55, CquiOR64, CquiOR93, CquiOR125, CquiOR132, CquiOR136, and CquiOR151.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We therefore surmised that DEET must be detected by highly expressed odorant receptors (ORs) given that only a very small fraction of molecules released in the air would reach neurons housed in antennal sensilla (13). Two out of the top 10 putative OR genes enriched in female antennae compared with control tissues (14), CquiOR21 (formerly CquiOR10) (15) and CquiOR95 (14), have already been deorphanized, and one putative OR, CquiOR36, is probably a pseudogene. We cloned the other seven putative ORs, CquiOR55, CquiOR64, CquiOR93, CquiOR125, CquiOR132, CquiOR136, and CquiOR151.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cloned the other seven putative ORs, CquiOR55, CquiOR64, CquiOR93, CquiOR125, CquiOR132, CquiOR136, and CquiOR151. We screened them for a DEET receptor by using the Xenopus oocyte recording system, as previously done to deorphanize multiple Culex ORs (9,(14)(15)(16)(17). CquiOR136•CquiOrco-expressing oocytes were mainly activated by DEET, PMD, IR3535, picaridin, and two other repellents, γ-octalactone and 3-octanol ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, comp14522_c0 appeared to be enriched in the abdomen, and comp12012_c0 was expressed at higher level in the abdomen than in antennae. It is unlikely that proteins predominantly expressed in non-olfactory tissues play a role in odorant reception in antennae (Leal et al, 2013). These OR genes are enriched in non-olfactory tissues, suggesting that they may play an important role in the unexpected expression in non-chemosensory tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were analyzed with 7300 System SDS Software v1.2.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). We chose b-actin (Canales et al 2009) and RsP7 (Leal et al 2013) as the internal normalization. The relative expression levels of each gene were calculated using the 2 -(DDCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%