2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential expression of peach ERF transcriptional activators in response to signaling molecules and inoculation with Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression levels were considerably higher in resistant cultivars, reaching 16 times in Zheza‐301 after 8 d. There was research found that the expression patterns of TaERF3 in resistant and susceptible cultivars varied after inoculation with various pathogens (Zhang et al, 2007). Five ERF genes ( Pp‐ERF1.a , Pp‐ERF1.b , Pp‐ERF2.a , Pp‐ERF2.b , and Pp‐ERF2.c ) were identified in peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch], among which Pp‐ERF2.b showed higher transcript level in the susceptible cultivar than in the resistant cultivar after infection with Xanthomonas campestris (Sherif et al, 2012). The differences in response to TYLCV in different tomato cultivars may be related to the specificity of different ERFs to different types of pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression levels were considerably higher in resistant cultivars, reaching 16 times in Zheza‐301 after 8 d. There was research found that the expression patterns of TaERF3 in resistant and susceptible cultivars varied after inoculation with various pathogens (Zhang et al, 2007). Five ERF genes ( Pp‐ERF1.a , Pp‐ERF1.b , Pp‐ERF2.a , Pp‐ERF2.b , and Pp‐ERF2.c ) were identified in peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch], among which Pp‐ERF2.b showed higher transcript level in the susceptible cultivar than in the resistant cultivar after infection with Xanthomonas campestris (Sherif et al, 2012). The differences in response to TYLCV in different tomato cultivars may be related to the specificity of different ERFs to different types of pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In leaves of P. persica, PpTLP-1 and PpTLP-2 were considerably more highly expressed in a cultivar resistant to Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni than in a susceptible one in response to bacteria inoculation (Sherif et al 2012). In the case of fruits of Prunus domestica challenged with the fungus Monilinia fructicola, while the levels of PdPR5-1 are constitutively higher in the resistant genotypes, the transcript levels promptly increased during the first days after infection (El-kereamy et al 2011).…”
Section: Early Responses Are Activated In Prunus Persica In Response mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same genes were activated in A. thaliana and Z. mays by perception of AtPep1 and ZmPep1, respectively (Huffaker et al ., ; Liu et al ., ). Consistent with a role of P. persica and P. dulcis Pep1 and Pep2 as endogenous elicitors, ERF‐1a , ERF‐2b , PR4 and PR5‐TLP2 defence‐related genes were also induced, at comparable levels and in a similar time course, in response to challenge with Xap (Table ; see also Sherif et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%