2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0061(20000115)16:1<49::aid-yea506>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential fates of invertase mutants in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that in many cases the rate‐limiting step in secretion of heterologous proteins in S. cerevisiae occurs at the ER‐to‐Golgi transition, and the efficiency of their secretion is determined by the capacity of the protein‐folding machinery in the ER (Parekh and Wittrup, 1997; Kowalski et al , 1998; McCracken et al , 2000). Human uPA expressed in S. cerevisiae and H. polymorpha has also been shown to be retained in the ER (Hiramatsu et al , 1991; Agaphonov et al , 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that in many cases the rate‐limiting step in secretion of heterologous proteins in S. cerevisiae occurs at the ER‐to‐Golgi transition, and the efficiency of their secretion is determined by the capacity of the protein‐folding machinery in the ER (Parekh and Wittrup, 1997; Kowalski et al , 1998; McCracken et al , 2000). Human uPA expressed in S. cerevisiae and H. polymorpha has also been shown to be retained in the ER (Hiramatsu et al , 1991; Agaphonov et al , 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although organization of the secretory pathway in yeast has the same basic principles as in other eukaryotic organisms, not all proteins of higher eukaryotes can be efficiently secreted from their cells. Secretion of some recombinant or mutant proteins is hampered by inefficient folding in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Parekh and Wittrup, 1997; Holkeri and Makarow, 1998; McCracken et al , 2000), which, in turn, causes their rapid degradation by the cytosolic proteasome complex after retrograde translocation from the lumenal to the cytoplasmic face of the ER, a mechanism called ‘ER‐associated degradation’ (ERAD; Hiller et al , 1996). The recognition and retention of misfolded proteins in the ER is carried out by the so‐called ‘ER quality control’ machinery (for review, see Parodi, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the E486 K mutation is unlikely to destabilize invertase, 40) we cannot exclude the possibility that it was retained in the ER by quality control mechanisms due to a conformational change in the invertase domain rather than a loss of interactions with the corresponding receptors.…”
Section: Invertase Domain Acted As An Er Exit Signalmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…38) Although the ER exit signal within invertase has not yet been identified, it has been reported that glutamate-486 was involved in its exit from the ER. 39,40) This amino acid residue is highly conserved among members of glycoside hydrolase Note: Cell lysates were prepared from prc1Δhrd1Δ pep4Δ (YKS30) cells expressing CPY (A), CPY* (A), CPY-Inv (B), or CPY*-Inv (B), and then incubated with or without trypsin for the indicated times, as described in "Materials and methods." After Endo H treatment, samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-CPY antiserum.…”
Section: Invertase Domain Acted As An Er Exit Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation