2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential gene expression in the mesocorticolimbic system of innately high- and low-impulsive rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above findings seem to limit the possibility that inhibition of hippocampal Mal expression as shown in the present study is linked to Mal alterations in the nucleus accumbens [20]. Furthermore, downregulation in the hippocampal Mal expression (present study) is also not related to impulsivity-as this kind of behavior is a key component of CUD [21]-since increased accumbal Mal in highly impulsive rats was recently discovered [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The above findings seem to limit the possibility that inhibition of hippocampal Mal expression as shown in the present study is linked to Mal alterations in the nucleus accumbens [20]. Furthermore, downregulation in the hippocampal Mal expression (present study) is also not related to impulsivity-as this kind of behavior is a key component of CUD [21]-since increased accumbal Mal in highly impulsive rats was recently discovered [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Transcriptional differences between HI and LI rats have been found in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc), ventral tegmental area, dorsomedial striatum and orbitofrontal cortex at basal conditions (Besson et al, 2013, Caprioli et al, 2014, Moloney et al, 2019). In the NAc, HI animals present a decreased availability of D1 and D2/3 receptors and of dopamine transporter (DAT) (Caprioli et al, 2015, Jupp et al, 2013) as well as a reduction in grey matter density (Caprioli et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene ontology (GO) (molecular function, 2021 database) was performed separately on upregulated and downregulated datasets (Hong et al, 2014) using EnrichR and the combined score metric as previously described; this is a product of the log of the p value computed by the Fisher exact test and the z score (Xie et al, 2021). DEU was performed using DEXSeq (Anders et al, 2012; Moloney et al, 2019). DEU was performed using DEXSeq (Anders et al, 2012; Moloney et al, 2019) As per the manual, DEXSeq is a strand‐specific analysis that measures the reads that map to a specific exon a gene and compares this with the amount of reads for other exons in that gene using the formula ‘number of transcripts from the gene that contain this exon divided by number of all transcripts from the gene’ (Anders et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEU was performed using DEXSeq (Anders et al, 2012; Moloney et al, 2019). DEU was performed using DEXSeq (Anders et al, 2012; Moloney et al, 2019) As per the manual, DEXSeq is a strand‐specific analysis that measures the reads that map to a specific exon a gene and compares this with the amount of reads for other exons in that gene using the formula ‘number of transcripts from the gene that contain this exon divided by number of all transcripts from the gene’ (Anders et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%