1989
DOI: 10.1080/03033910.1989.10557766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Genetic Aetiology of Reading Disability as a Function of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimates for group deficits in spelling recognition were .63 in the younger group and .52 in the older group, and did not differ significantly. Nevertheless, Wadsworth et al (1989) suggested that the greater difference between the heritabilities of word recognition deficits as a function of age than the difference between the heritabilities of spelling deficits as a function of age might be suggestive of a developmental dissociation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The estimates for group deficits in spelling recognition were .63 in the younger group and .52 in the older group, and did not differ significantly. Nevertheless, Wadsworth et al (1989) suggested that the greater difference between the heritabilities of word recognition deficits as a function of age than the difference between the heritabilities of spelling deficits as a function of age might be suggestive of a developmental dissociation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This suggests a possible dissociation in the etiology and remediation of reading and spelling deficits. Previous behavioral genetic analyses of twin data have suggested a possible developmental dissociation between genetic influences on word reading and spelling deficits as a function of age, wherein genetic influence declined across age for word recognition, and increased for spelling recognition (DeFries et al 1997;Wadsworth et al 1989). However, none of the age trends for word recognition and spelling was statistically significant in these studies because their samples were small and they had limited power to find significant effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The models outlined in equations (1) and (2) have been extended to capture differential heritability across levels of cognitive ability (Cherny et al, 1992a), differential heritability by age (Wadsworth et al, 1989) and differential heritability by gender (DeFries et al, 1993). This is achieved, in the context of a focus on gender, and in relation to equation (1), by adding gender interaction terms as follows (see, for example, Detterman et al, 1990, p. 373):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%