1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00398310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential geometry on linear quantum groups

Abstract: An exterior derivative, inner derivation, and Lie derivative are introduced on the quantum group GL q (N ). SL q (N ) is then obtained by constructing matrices with determinant unity, and the induced calculus is found.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That's why for generic q = 1 the four matrix elements of either (dT )T or (dT )T are independent, and make up alternative bases for both Ω * S and Ω * . Actually, one can check (we will give details in [18]) that (d, Ω * ) coincides with the bicovariant differential calculus on M q (2), GL q (2) [44,46], and (d, Ω * S ) coincides with the Woronowicz 4D-bicovariant one [53,43] on C(SU q (2)).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That's why for generic q = 1 the four matrix elements of either (dT )T or (dT )T are independent, and make up alternative bases for both Ω * S and Ω * . Actually, one can check (we will give details in [18]) that (d, Ω * ) coincides with the bicovariant differential calculus on M q (2), GL q (2) [44,46], and (d, Ω * S ) coincides with the Woronowicz 4D-bicovariant one [53,43] on C(SU q (2)).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] are made to be isomorphic (as ⋆-algebras) if they are slightly extended so as to contain suitable rational functions of their respective central elements; therefore that noncommutative sphere can be regarded as a compactification of A. In section 3 we reformulate in q-quaternion language the SO q (4)-covariant differential calculus [this turns out to coincide with the bicovariant differential calculus on M q (2), GL q (2) [44,46], and after imposing the unit q-determinant condition with the Woronowicz 4D-bicovariant differential calculus [53,43] on C (SU q (2))], the SO q (4)-covariant q-epsilon tensor and Hodge map [21,19,37,20] on Ω * (R 4 q ). In section 4 we recall some basic notions about the standard framework [9] for gauge theories on noncommutative spaces, pointing out where it doesn't fit the present model, and we formulate (anti)selfduality equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, we shall suppose the R-matrix to be skew-invertible that is there exists an n 2 × n 2 matrix Ψ such that In the compact notations the above formula reads T r (2) R 12 Ψ 23 = P 13 = T r (2) Ψ 12 R 23 , (1.6) where the symbol T r (2) means the calculation of trace in the second space and P is the permutation matrix.…”
Section: Reflection Equation Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can use differential structure of SL h (2), applying the same contraction proccess in the level of differentials too. To construct differential structure one should use the following relations [20,21,16]…”
Section: µ-Deformation Of the Two Dimensional Poincaré Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%