2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:hydr.0000041603.41913.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Impacts of Copepods and Cladocerans on Lake Seston, and Resulting Effects on Zooplankton Growth

Abstract: In an enclosure study in Scho¨hsee, a small mesotrophic lake in Northern Germany, the impact of copepods and daphniids on the seston community was studied. In general, these two guilds differ in their feeding behaviour. Copepods actively select their food, with a preference for larger particles, whereas most cladocerans are unselective filter-feeders. In this study we investigate how the impact of the two different grazers affects zooplankton growth. We combine results obtained in the laboratory with results m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the time-response of the RNA: DNA ratio may be slower in Eurytemora than in Daphnia owing to lower growth rates and longer generation times of copepods than those of cladocerans (Becker et al 2004). This may have led to a temporal decoupling between zooplankton and seston, so that the RNA:DNA ratio of zooplankton sampled at a given station could instead integrate the signal of an earlier feeding episode on some other seston of different quality.…”
Section: Apparent Decoupling Between Seston Fa Composition and Zooplamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the time-response of the RNA: DNA ratio may be slower in Eurytemora than in Daphnia owing to lower growth rates and longer generation times of copepods than those of cladocerans (Becker et al 2004). This may have led to a temporal decoupling between zooplankton and seston, so that the RNA:DNA ratio of zooplankton sampled at a given station could instead integrate the signal of an earlier feeding episode on some other seston of different quality.…”
Section: Apparent Decoupling Between Seston Fa Composition and Zooplamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the intermediate trophic level (mainly occupied by ciliates, but also some heterotrophic dinoflagellates) was clearly evident in numerous mesocosm experiments where plankton assemblages were subject to different copepod densities (BECKER et al, 2004;BURNS and SCHALLENBERG, 1996;FEUCHTMAYR et al, 2004;GRANÉLI and TURNER, 2002;SOMMER, F. et al 2005;SOMMER, F. et al 2005;SOMMER et al, 2001SOMMER et al, , 2004SOM-MER and SOMMER, 2006). Copepods always suppressed larger and medium sized protozoa, thus relaxing their predatory impact on heterotrophic nanoflagellates and nanophytoplankton, which could compensate the top-down effect of copepods on larger phytoplankton.…”
Section: Omnivory and Intermediate Trophic Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has previously been shown in freshwater ecosystems, where copepod grazing positively affected Daphnia growth (Becker et al 2004). In marine systems this nonselective feeding could be played by ciliates, appendicularians (Bedo et al 1993), or by cladocerans.…”
Section: Mesocosmsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The effects have been studied on various levels from bacteria to zooplankton (see F. U. Sommer et al 2001Zö llner et al 2003;Becker et al 2004). In this paper we focus on interactions between the phytoplankton community and the nutritional status of the zooplankton.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%