2017
DOI: 10.3354/meps12069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential impacts of foraging plasticity by greater flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus on intertidal soft sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Langebaan Lagoon, Z. capensis has been shown to be spatially excluded by sandprawns ( K. kraussi ) in higher densities, that subsequently increase sediment suspension and destabilise sediments ( Siebert & Branch, 2005 ; Hanekom & Russell, 2015 ). Qualitative field observations also showed bioturbator pressure from Greater flamingos ( Phoenicopterus roseus ) and Lesser flamingos ( Phoeniconaias minor ) which both form donut-shaped depressions due to trampling and their circular filter feeding technique, resulting in sediment resuspension, and increased nutrient flows, causing root destabilisation and enhanced biofilm production ( Gihwala, Pillay & Varughese, 2017 ; El-Hacen et al, 2018 ). Bioturbator interactions in combination with (1) small, spatially isolated transplant plots, (2) planted at sites across a tidal gradient where sandprawn density is known to increase towards the lower intertidal zone ( Siebert & Branch, 2006 ), likely led to negative density-dependent effects and account for significantly lower survival rates and area cover in the upper-mid and mid-intertidal zones, in comparison to the upper-intertidal zone, in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Langebaan Lagoon, Z. capensis has been shown to be spatially excluded by sandprawns ( K. kraussi ) in higher densities, that subsequently increase sediment suspension and destabilise sediments ( Siebert & Branch, 2005 ; Hanekom & Russell, 2015 ). Qualitative field observations also showed bioturbator pressure from Greater flamingos ( Phoenicopterus roseus ) and Lesser flamingos ( Phoeniconaias minor ) which both form donut-shaped depressions due to trampling and their circular filter feeding technique, resulting in sediment resuspension, and increased nutrient flows, causing root destabilisation and enhanced biofilm production ( Gihwala, Pillay & Varughese, 2017 ; El-Hacen et al, 2018 ). Bioturbator interactions in combination with (1) small, spatially isolated transplant plots, (2) planted at sites across a tidal gradient where sandprawn density is known to increase towards the lower intertidal zone ( Siebert & Branch, 2006 ), likely led to negative density-dependent effects and account for significantly lower survival rates and area cover in the upper-mid and mid-intertidal zones, in comparison to the upper-intertidal zone, in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed differences in the use of tidal phases by flamingos and crabs are likely caused by their feeding habits. Flamingos are filter‐feeders and thus need some tidal water to stir up the sediment with their feet to harvest buried microphytobenthos (Gihwala et al ). This motion will prevent the settlement of new sediment and maintains the bowls and mound structures, which seems to create a favourable conditions for the growth of biofilms (Gerbersdorf and Wieprecht ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest zone on average (including all microhabitats) had an elevation of −13.12 ± 2.6 cm compared with average sea level, while the lowest one had an average elevation of −5.9 ± 4 cm. The lowest zone is used mainly by flamingos and can be recognised by signs of flamingo feeding: extensive circular pits of up to 1.4 m in width (Gihwala et al ) with a sand heap in the middle that are clearly visible even on aerial photos (area L in Fig. b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a few years, Greater Flamingos have been observed regularly in the Lagoon of Venice, feeding or resting in the large extensions of shallow bottoms. The presence of thousands of Greater Flamingos should promote studies dealing with the possible effects of intertidal sediment properties and biological characteristics on Greater Flamingo activity (see for a review Gayet et al 2012 andGihwala et al 2017), as well as conservation actions aimed at reducing disturbance to the flocks occurring in this highly anthropised lagoon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%