2017
DOI: 10.1177/0893318917728340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Impacts of Functional, Geographical, and Hierarchical Diversity on Knowledge Sharing in the Midst of Organizational Change

Abstract: Organizations have been diversifying their workforce to better respond to fast-changing environments. However, research has indicated that the effects of diversity can vary by a number of contextual influences. This study examines the differential impacts of functional, geographical, and hierarchical diversity on expertise awareness, knowledge transfer, and knowledge acquisition during a large-scale organizational change. The analysis of full network data (N = 211) collected from a multinational high-tech orga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta-analyses do not provide clear results (Bell, Villado, Lukasik, Belau, & Briggs, 2011; Guillaume, Brodbeck, & Riketta, 2012; Stahl et al, 2010). According to some (Joshi & Roh, 2009; Kim, 2018; Meyer & Glenz, 2013), the effects of diversity on team processes seem to be context dependent, and there are several mediators and moderators. There seems to be no main effect of team diversity with regard to a specific type of diversity (e.g., gender diversity) on team outcomes.…”
Section: Diversity Faultlines and Their Effects On Team Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses do not provide clear results (Bell, Villado, Lukasik, Belau, & Briggs, 2011; Guillaume, Brodbeck, & Riketta, 2012; Stahl et al, 2010). According to some (Joshi & Roh, 2009; Kim, 2018; Meyer & Glenz, 2013), the effects of diversity on team processes seem to be context dependent, and there are several mediators and moderators. There seems to be no main effect of team diversity with regard to a specific type of diversity (e.g., gender diversity) on team outcomes.…”
Section: Diversity Faultlines and Their Effects On Team Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders may overhaul internal coordination protocols to see whether relevant parties are excluded from the loop. It is certainly beneficial to train employees to be open-minded and value equity; however, it is also crucial to design institutional solutions and policies that formally support inclusiveness (Kim, 2018). As social status may affect the process of evaluation or attribution, management must take into account the effects of social status on members’ interactions and performance reviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing distance reduces opportunities for serendipitous and spontaneous informal talk (Allen, 1977;Boh, Ren, Kiesler, & Bussjaeger, 2007). Chance and frequent encounters with past collaborators are important for the knowledge recombination process as such chance meetings smoothen subsequent communication and awareness of relevant knowledge resources (Allen, 1977;Allen & Fustfeld, 1975;Kim, 2018). A collegial collocated environment might prove crucial for knowledge awareness and innovation search as Fleming (2002) explains: "Simple physical proximity increased the probability of unplanned meetings and nonprofessional friendships in cafeterias and at Christmas parties or softball games.…”
Section: Ego Network Geographical Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction and coordination. Collocated past collaborators are more likely to transfer knowledge to each other compared to more distant network contacts (Kim, 2018;Singh, 2005).…”
Section: Ego Network Geographical Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%