2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential inequalities in multi-agent coordination and opinion dynamics modeling

Abstract: Many distributed algorithms for multi-agent coordination employ the simple averaging dynamics, referred to as the Laplacian flow. Besides the standard consensus protocols, examples include, but are not limited to, algorithms for aggregation and containment control, target surrounding, distributed optimization and models of opinion formation in social groups. In spite of their similarities, each of these algorithms has been studied using separate mathematical techniques. In this paper, we show that stability an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 3 thus requires some tools that are principally different from usual contraction analysis [44], [45]; its proof is actually based on the seminal idea of the solution's ordering originally used to study undelayed typesymmetric algorithms in [28] (a similar yet slightly different technique was employed in [27], [38]). As shown in our previous works [41], [60], averaging inequalities, which are beyond the scope of this paper, have numerous applications in multi-agent control and social dynamics modeling.…”
Section: A Comparison To Alternative Criteriamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 3 thus requires some tools that are principally different from usual contraction analysis [44], [45]; its proof is actually based on the seminal idea of the solution's ordering originally used to study undelayed typesymmetric algorithms in [28] (a similar yet slightly different technique was employed in [27], [38]). As shown in our previous works [41], [60], averaging inequalities, which are beyond the scope of this paper, have numerous applications in multi-agent control and social dynamics modeling.…”
Section: A Comparison To Alternative Criteriamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, Theorem 1 is not valid for the inequalities and estimates like (13) cannot be established for them (in fact, consensus in (18) requires strong connectivity of the persistent graph G ∞ [59], [60]). Theorem 3 thus requires some tools that are principally different from usual contraction analysis [44], [45]; its proof is actually based on the seminal idea of the solution's ordering originally used to study undelayed typesymmetric algorithms in [28] (a similar yet slightly different technique was employed in [27], [38]).…”
Section: A Comparison To Alternative Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start with consensus algorithms, based on the principle of iterative averaging (similar dynamics appear in the literature under different names, e.g. local voting [Amelina et al, 2015, Vergados et al, 2018, Laplacian flows [Bullo, 2018, Proskurnikov andCao, 2017a] or rendezvous algorithm [Lin et al, 2007a]).…”
Section: Consensus Via Iterative Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the detailed analysis of Altafini models over static and time-varying graphs the reader is referred to , Meng et al, 2016, Xia et al, 2016, Proskurnikov and Cao, 2017a, Proskurnikov and Cao, 2017b, Liu et al, 2017.…”
Section: Balance and Negativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent results from [32] allow non-instantaneous forms of the latter property, for instance, the action of group S on group S c may be responded after some limited amount of time. It is remarkable that some conditions of reciprocity imply consensus not only in the ODE system (1), but also in the system of associated differential inequalities [33]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%