1999
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Inhibition of Smad6 and Smad7 on Bone Morphogenetic Protein- and Activin-mediated Growth Arrest and Apoptosis in B Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
161
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
161
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One way by which this occurs is through the action of inhibitory (I-) Smads (Fig. 1) CELL PROLIFERATION CONTROL BY SMADS (Hayashi et al, 1997;Imamura et al, 1997;Nakao et al, 1997;Hata et al, 1998a;Ishisaki et al, 1998Ishisaki et al, , 1999Souchelnytskyi et al, 1998;Lebrun et al, 1999). Whereas Smad7 acts as a general inhibitor of TGF-b family member signaling pathway, Smad6 preferentially blocks BMP signaling Ishisaki et al, 1999).…”
Section: Negative Regulation Of R-and Co-smadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One way by which this occurs is through the action of inhibitory (I-) Smads (Fig. 1) CELL PROLIFERATION CONTROL BY SMADS (Hayashi et al, 1997;Imamura et al, 1997;Nakao et al, 1997;Hata et al, 1998a;Ishisaki et al, 1998Ishisaki et al, , 1999Souchelnytskyi et al, 1998;Lebrun et al, 1999). Whereas Smad7 acts as a general inhibitor of TGF-b family member signaling pathway, Smad6 preferentially blocks BMP signaling Ishisaki et al, 1999).…”
Section: Negative Regulation Of R-and Co-smadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) CELL PROLIFERATION CONTROL BY SMADS (Hayashi et al, 1997;Imamura et al, 1997;Nakao et al, 1997;Hata et al, 1998a;Ishisaki et al, 1998Ishisaki et al, , 1999Souchelnytskyi et al, 1998;Lebrun et al, 1999). Whereas Smad7 acts as a general inhibitor of TGF-b family member signaling pathway, Smad6 preferentially blocks BMP signaling Ishisaki et al, 1999). The ®rst described mechanism for I-Smads antagonism was through their competition with R-Smads for the interaction with the activated type I receptor (Hayashi et al, 1997;Imamura et al, 1997;Nakao et al, 1997;Souchelnytskyi et al, 1998).…”
Section: Negative Regulation Of R-and Co-smadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both Smads 6 and 7 inhibit Smad-mediated signaling events, Smad6 ~3,301. appears more specific for BMP related signaling [15,19]. Smad6 mediated inhibition has been shown to be important in a number of cells and tissues, playing a fundamental role in processes such as development [ 10,321, apoptosis [19] and tissue repair [33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] The antiproliferative activity of TGFb, Acts and BMPs in lymphocytes is well established. 17,18 However, TGFb family members modulate many other B-and T-cell responses like cell adhesion, apoptosis or cytokine secretion. [19][20][21] At the cell surface, TGFb, Act or BMPs bind to a type II receptor, which recruits and phosphorylates a type I receptor to form a type I/type II receptor complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%