Differential leadership and organizational corruption in China

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the effect of differential leadership on organizational corruption by developing a measure of organizational corruption and proposing a moderated mediation model. The model focuses on the mediating role of moral disengagement underpinning the relationship between differential leadership and organizational corruption, and the moderating role of organizational justice in influencing the mediation. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected 210 responses from online participants with full time work experience and 57 MBA students answered the survey offline. Findings Results showed that differential leadership was positively associated with organizational corruption. Furthermore, moral disengagement fully mediated the relationship between differential leadership and organizational corruption. Besides, distributive justice negatively but procedural justice positively moderated the indirect effect of moral disengagement. Research limitations/implications Testing the moderated mediation model helps to advance the theoretical understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the effect of differential leadership on organizational corrupt behavior. Originality/value This empirical study provides preliminary evidence of the mediating role of moral disengagement in the positive relationship between differential leadership and organizational corruption. The mediated moderation also extends the finding by adding organizational justice as the moderator to explain how the effect of differential leadership on organizational corruption. Finally, this study provides initial evidence for organizational corruption measure.

Despotic Leadership and Front-Line Employee Deviant Work Behaviors in Service Organizations: The Roles of Moral Disengagement and Moral Identity

“…They may also be useful to capture despotic leadership behaviors. Future studies could use triad designs (focal person, peer-reported and supervisor-reported) for better results and authenticity (Greenbaum, Mawritz, and Eissa 2012;Moore et al 2019;Tang, Zhan, and Chen 2018). While acknowledging the complexities of a longitudinal research design, future studies should collect data on all study variables at each data collection point.…”

Favouritism: a recipe for ostracism? How jealousy and self-esteem intervene

“…Our study further contributes to the literature on leader favouritism, jealousy and ostracism by identifying OBSE as a key factor mitigating the harmful effect of leader favouritism on ostracising behaviours (via jealousy), significantly adding to the small and growing literature (see for example, Tang et al ., 2018; Yang et al ., 2021). Our finding suggests that employees high in OSBE and those low in OSBE differ in how they interpret and respond to social cues in the work environment; those high in OBSE do not view the target of jealousy (rivals; favoured colleague) as a threat but as an invaluable opportunity for growth (Brockner, 1988; Duffy et al ., 2006).…”

Positive Effect of Narcissism on Employees’ Whistleblowing: The Role of Felt Accountability and Ethical Environment

“…Fraud, corruption, and other unethical acts threaten an organization’s reputation, financial performance, and sustainability. 1 , 2 However, they are often observed by one or a small number of individuals and may avoid existing institutional controls. 3 , 4 Thus, the whistleblower may provide valuable information to help minimize wrong doing and improve organizational effectiveness.…”