2011
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00809.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Modulation of Synaptic Strength and Timing Regulate Synaptic Efficacy in a Motor Network

Abstract: Neuromodulators modify network output by altering neuronal firing properties and synaptic strength at multiple sites; however, the functional importance of each site is often unclear. We determined the importance of monoamine modulation of a single synapse for regulation of network cycle frequency in the oscillatory pyloric network of the lobster. The pacemaker kernel of the pyloric network receives only one chemical synaptic feedback, an inhibitory synapse from the lateral pyloric (LP) neuron to the pyloric d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple modulators can act on the same synapse to modify its strength, presumably depending on the behavioral need [24,25]. Such effects can be drastic: 5-HT can functionally silence synapses in the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion (STG), whereas dopamine can unmask synapses that are normally silent [26].…”
Section: Neuromodulation Of Synaptic Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple modulators can act on the same synapse to modify its strength, presumably depending on the behavioral need [24,25]. Such effects can be drastic: 5-HT can functionally silence synapses in the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion (STG), whereas dopamine can unmask synapses that are normally silent [26].…”
Section: Neuromodulation Of Synaptic Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 10 min bath application of 100 M DA phase advanced LP, reduced LP burst duration and increased pacemaker cycle frequency (Flamm and Harris-Warrick, 1986a). Under these conditions the phase of LP was shifted relative to pacemaker kernel, and LP synaptic inhibition was ineffective because it occurred when the pacemaker kernel was in the refractory period of its oscillation (Johnson et al, 2011). LP lost its functionality in this situation; it could no longer slow cycle frequency, so the upper limit on network cycle frequency vanished.…”
Section: A Slow Phase Recovery Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LP may retune its resonance frequency to match the pacemaker to maintain network functionality, as the efficacy of LP feedback inhibition depends on pacemaker phase (Thirumalai et al, 2006). Indeed, LP cannot establish an upper limit on network cycle frequency in prolonged micromolar DA, because the phase relationship between LP and the pacemaker is distorted, causing LP synaptic inhibition onto the pacemaker to occur when the pacemaker is less sensitive to inhibition (Johnson et al, 2011). Alternatively changes in LP I h may alter the strength of the PD synapse onto LP.…”
Section: Phase Homeostasis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Invertebrate preparations, with their simple and accessible nervous systems, provide several useful models for the analysis of motor neuron coordination (Marder and Bucher, 2007; Goaillard et al, 2009; Buschges et al, 2011; Johnson et al, 2011). We used the leech heartbeat CPG to assess the relative contributions of temporal pattern and synaptic strength profiles in the functional coordination of motor neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%