2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential modulatory effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on a facial expression go-no-go task in males and females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women had a significantly better tDCS effect on TQ and tinnitus loudness. Gender effects have been previously reported for tDCS over various brain areas including the occipital [3], temporal [1], and frontal cortex [14]. Also, auditory and emotional processing depends on gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Women had a significantly better tDCS effect on TQ and tinnitus loudness. Gender effects have been previously reported for tDCS over various brain areas including the occipital [3], temporal [1], and frontal cortex [14]. Also, auditory and emotional processing depends on gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Different studies have reported gender-specific effects of tDCS applied to different brain regions, investigating a variety of cognitive abilities, for example to the dorsolateral PFC for verbal working memory34, the left parietal cortex for visual spatial attention35, the bilateral temporal cortex for somatosensory integration36, and the bilateral superior temporal cortex for facial expression recognition37. A second possible non-specific interpretation could rely on gender-related neuroanatomical differences .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding could be explained by sex differences in the anatomical location of the DLPFC [84] and in cognitive task performance and associated brain activation patterns (e.g. women take a more 'top-down' cognitive strategy than men, relying more heavily on higher-order frontal regions, which is enhanced by DLPFC tDCS) [85]; or, most plausibly, hormonal differences affecting brain stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability between women and men [86][87][88], as demonstrated previously in studies investigating the effects of rTMS on cortical excitability [89,90]. However, the finding that gender influences the effects of stimulation dose on a-tDCS efficacy for accuracy rates should be interpreted with caution, as our meta-analysis is based on aggregate, and not individual patient data [91,92].…”
Section: Healthy Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%