2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep37259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential neural encoding of sensorimotor and visual body representations

Abstract: Sensorimotor processing specifically impacts mental body representations. In particular, deteriorated somatosensory input (as after complete spinal cord injury) increases the relative weight of visual aspects of body parts’ representations, leading to aberrancies in how images of body parts are mentally manipulated (e.g. mental rotation). This suggests that a sensorimotor or visual reference frame, respectively, can be relatively dominant in local (hands) versus global (full-body) bodily representations. On th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(80 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also showed an association between BS and the caudate nucleus, which contributes to implement the correct action schemas and to select appropriate subgoals based on an evaluation of action-outcomes [ 33 ]. This is consistent with fMRI studies on motor imagery [ 34 , 35 ] and underlines the importance of processing motor information to build up BS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We have also showed an association between BS and the caudate nucleus, which contributes to implement the correct action schemas and to select appropriate subgoals based on an evaluation of action-outcomes [ 33 ]. This is consistent with fMRI studies on motor imagery [ 34 , 35 ] and underlines the importance of processing motor information to build up BS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Each runs contained 48 images belonging to one identity (self, other). Each image was repeated three times at a given orientation, with the same image never presented twice in sequence [5]. Each trial began with a fixation cross in the centre of the computer screen followed by an image 1000ms later.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition (Urgesi et al, 2007;Candidi et al, 2008) or lesion (Peelen and Downing, 2007) of EBA support its causal implication in selectively respond to the observation of human bodies. Not only is EBA important for body-related visual processing, but also it is involved in higher-level visual cognition related to the human body, including identity attribution (Myers and Sowden, 2008), emotional resonance (Ionta et al, 2020), and mental imagery (Arzy et al, 2006;Costantini et al, 2011;Perruchoud et al, 2016). Even if the development of EBA in the life span remains largely unexplored, recent evidence suggests that the development of the body-specific responsiveness of EBA can take several years.…”
Section: Body Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%