2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11854-014-0019-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential operators for a scale of Poisson type kernels in the unit disc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24], Olofsson proved that, for parameter values α > −1, a function f ∈ C 2 (D) satisfies (1.1) if and only if it has the form of a Poisson type integral…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], Olofsson proved that, for parameter values α > −1, a function f ∈ C 2 (D) satisfies (1.1) if and only if it has the form of a Poisson type integral…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work of Olofsson [34] shows the following. We assume that θ is a nonnegative integer for technical reasons; the result may well be true for general real θ > − 1 2 .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[33]. More recently, in [34] the kernels U N,N are shown to solve the Dirichlet problem in the disk D for a certain (singular) second order elliptic differential operator. It remains to substantiate that U j,N is N-harmonic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the function P α is as in (5). Notice that u = P 0 [f ] is the usual Poisson integral representation of a harmonic function in D. The Poisson integral representation u = P α [f ] leads to improved convergence to boundary values (in norm as well as non-tangentially) of solutions of (3) provided the boundary data f ∈ D (T) has some appropriate regularity, see [2][3][4] for results. Let us recall the notion of Lipschitz continuity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this more general validity of (8) compared to (7) is quite natural from the point of view of convolution structure in (6) and an interpretation of the differential operator z∂ −z∂ as angular derivative. The growth estimate (8) is established for u = P α [f ] with a fairly economical constant C = C(f ) using a precise result on the L 1 -means of the function P α from Olofsson and Wittsten [2, Section 2] later refined in Olofsson [3] (see Theorem 2.4). We mention that inequality (8) generalizes a recent result by Chen [10,Lemma 3.2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%