2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11005-006-0129-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Operators on Supercircle: Conformally Equivariant Quantization and Symbol Calculus

Abstract: We consider the supercircle S 1|1 equipped with the standard contact structure. The conformal Lie superalgebra K(1) acts on S 1|1 as the Lie superalgebra of contact vector fields; it contains the Möbius superalgebra osp(1|2). We study the space of linear differential operators on weighted densities as a module over osp(1|2). We introduce the canonical isomorphism between this space and the corresponding space of symbols and find interesting resonant cases where such an isomorphism does not exist.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the Killing form of sl(p + 1|q) is given by K(A, B) = str(ad(A)ad(B)) = 2(p + 1 − q) str(AB) (13) for all A and B in sl(p + 1|q). Under our assumption q = p + 1, it is a non-degenerate even supersymmetric bilinear form on this algebra.…”
Section: Casimir Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then the Killing form of sl(p + 1|q) is given by K(A, B) = str(ad(A)ad(B)) = 2(p + 1 − q) str(AB) (13) for all A and B in sl(p + 1|q). Under our assumption q = p + 1, it is a non-degenerate even supersymmetric bilinear form on this algebra.…”
Section: Casimir Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several papers dealt with the problem of equivariant quantizations in the context of supergeometry: first, in [13,30] the problem of equivariant quantizations over the supercircles S 1|1 and S 1|2 was considered (with respect to orthosymplectic superalgebras). Second, the thesis [31] dealt with conformally equivariant quantizations over supercotangent bundles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One checks that g(x)D acts on F (λ) by the differential operator gD + 2λξg ′ . In this context, the fine filtration was introduced in [GMO07]. It is the Con R 1|1 -invariant N/2-filtration The explicit formula for CQ λ,p was deduced in [CMZ97] for (λ, p) = (0, 0), and in [GMO07] in general.…”
Section: |1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the fine filtration was introduced in [GMO07]. It is the Con R 1|1 -invariant N/2-filtration The explicit formula for CQ λ,p was deduced in [CMZ97] for (λ, p) = (0, 0), and in [GMO07] in general. Problems 1 and 5 are largely solved in [Co08], and Problem 4 was reduced to computation.…”
Section: |1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us now recall the following classic result [17,13]: if X ∈ k(1), there exists a unique superfunction f (x, ξ) = a(x) − 2ξb(x), called the contact Hamiltonian, such that X = X f , where…”
Section: The Super Lie Algebra K(1) Of Contact Vector Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%