1989
DOI: 10.2307/2388643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Predation of Welfia georgii Seeds in Treefall Gaps and the Forest Understory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
3
7

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
27
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed high predation in all microsites but no significant differences between gaps and intact terra firme forest (Wenny 2000) where other studies have shown both more (Schupp and Frost 1989) and less predation in gaps (reviewed in Notman and Gorchov 2001) compared to the forest. Seeds survived at the same levels or higher for all three test species in the wet forest compared to the dry, so flooding may have reduced predation (Wurm 1998) or perhaps predators were less abundant in the flooded forest.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Neotropic Studiescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…This study showed high predation in all microsites but no significant differences between gaps and intact terra firme forest (Wenny 2000) where other studies have shown both more (Schupp and Frost 1989) and less predation in gaps (reviewed in Notman and Gorchov 2001) compared to the forest. Seeds survived at the same levels or higher for all three test species in the wet forest compared to the dry, so flooding may have reduced predation (Wurm 1998) or perhaps predators were less abundant in the flooded forest.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Neotropic Studiescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…By contrast though, while raised light levels and other microclimatic changes may physiologically affect invertebrates in adverse ways, they could also be more susceptible to small mammals as their predators. Seeds in gaps are therefore more likely to be found first by small mammals-rodents in particularand those in the understory later (Schupp 1988, Schupp and Frost 1989, Beck et al 2004, Norghauer et al 2006, Carvajal and Adler 2008. Our results suggest that dispersal to canopy gaps can moderate the relative impact of vertebrate vs. invertebrate enemies in the brief seed-to-seedling transition of forest trees to increase establishment there relative to the understory.…”
Section: Effects Of Canopy Cover On Predationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Both woody debris and vine tangles in gaps provide good shelter for small mammals against larger vertebrate (including avian and reptile) predators (IsabiryeBasuta and Kasenene 1989, Schupp and Frost 1989, Beck et al 2004. By contrast though, while raised light levels and other microclimatic changes may physiologically affect invertebrates in adverse ways, they could also be more susceptible to small mammals as their predators.…”
Section: Effects Of Canopy Cover On Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schupp & Frost (1989) argued that even if some removed seeds survive, the removal tends to correlate strongly with predation. These and other authors also found signs of seeds consumed inside experimental plots (Schupp & Frost 1989), plastic trays (Díaz et al 1999) or tied to nylon threads (Burkey 1994, Blate et al 1998). On the other hand, few studies observed dispersion of seeds after their removal (Forget 1992a, Asquith et al 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%