Differential Prediction of Resilience Among Individuals With and Without a History of Abuse

Smith, Laura Bailey; Lenz, A. Stephen; Strohmer, Douglas C.

doi:10.1002/cvj.12052

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, the discriminant validity investigation with resilience revealed a moderately significant negative correlation. This finding also supports the idea that individuals with higher levels of resilience tend to cope with stressful events more successfully than those with lower resilience (Haktanir et al, 2016;Smith et al, 2017). CFA, reliability, and validity results demonstrate that the underlying theoretical framework of the fear of COVID-19 is valid in the language of Turkish.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Adaptation and evaluation of Turkish version of the fear of COVID-19 Scale

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated the psychometric properties of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale in Turkish among a diverse group with a focus on the prevalence of coronavirus related fear across gender, age intervals, SES, chronic illness situation, and educational level. Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, the Fear of COVID-19 Scale had appropriate psychometric properties for utilization, including excellent goodness-of-fit indices, a Cronbach's alpha value of .86, and discriminant validity, as shown by a significant negative correlation with resilience. Furthermore, group comparison analyses revealed that women reported significantly higher fear of coronavirus. Additionally, individuals from middle SES reported significantly higher fear of coronavirus while the fear of coronavirus did not differ based on participants' educational level, socioeconomic status, and age level. Implications for mental health providers are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Adaptation and evaluation of Turkish version of the fear of COVID-19 Scale

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Personality conceptualizations of resilience in the face of childhood maltreatment were further subcharacterized. Several studies considered resilience to be individuals displaying an ability to “bounce back” after adversity and to recover from and cope with trauma (Arslan, 2015; Bradley et al, 2013; Smith et al, 2017). Other studies focused not only on the resistance to the damaging impact of trauma but also on the ability to thrive in the face of adversity (Berkowski & MacDonald, 2014; Beutel et al, 2017).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resilience: Conceptualization Assessment and Associated Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is unsurprising given that assessment of resilience is often influenced by the conceptual definition of resilience. Researchers who conceptualize resilience as a personal trait have primarily used personality or coping scales for assessment (Arslan, 2015; Smith, Lenz, & Strohmer, 2017). Researchers who conceptualize resilience as an outcome or process of positive adaptation have typically utilized measures of functioning across multiple areas of competence (e.g., cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and social; Luthar & Cicchetti, 2000).…”

Section: Resilience: Conceptualization Assessment and Associated Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Resilience Following Child Maltreatment: Definitional Considerations and Developmental Variations

Yoon

Howell

Dillard

et al. 2019

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resilience following childhood maltreatment has received substantial empirical attention, with the number of studies on this construct growing exponentially in the past decade. While there is ample interest, inconsistencies remain about how to conceptualize and assess resilience. Further, there is a lack of consensus on how developmental stage influences resilience and how protective factors affect its expression. The current systematic review uses a developmental lens to synthesize findings on resilience following child maltreatment. Specifically, this article consolidates the body of empirical literature in a developmentally oriented review, with the intention of inclusively assessing three key areas—the conceptualization of resilience, assessment of resilience, and factors associated with resilience in maltreatment research. A total of 67 peer-reviewed, quantitative empirical articles that examined child maltreatment and resilience were included in this review. Results indicate that some inconsistencies in the literature may be addressed by utilizing a developmental lens and considering the individual’s life stage when selecting a definition of resilience and associated measurement tool. The findings also support developmental variations in factors associated with resilience, with different individual, relational, and community protective factors emerging based on life stage. Implications for practice, policy, and research are incorporated throughout this review.

show abstract

“…A nivel meso y exo sistémico, la identidad cultural entendida como los factores culturales, las prácticas culturales y costumbres (Walters, 2016) la identidad bicultural (Sirikantraporn, 2017) el modelamiento de estilos no violentos y la recuperación de la voz de los ancianos (Asay, DeFrain, Metzger, & Moyer 2016, Burnette, 2018, el papel positivo de la religión y la espiritualidad (Ghafournia, 2017;Schaefer, Howell, Thurston, Kaufman, 2018;Smith, Lenz, & Strohmer, 2017) y el acceso a redes de apoyo paralelas a la familia (Schofield, Biggart, Ward, & Larsson, 2015).…”

Section: Total 74unclassified

Panorama científico de la relación entre la violencia intrafamiliar y de género y la resiliencia familiar: posibilidades, retos y límites

Jaramillo-Moreno¹,

Ramírez²

2020

Divers.: Perspect. Psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En el marco de la investigación titulada “Resiliencia en víctimas de violencia intrafamiliar y de género Fase 1”, realizada por el programa de Psicología de la Universidad Santo Tomás de Aquino (Bogotá, Colombia), se realizó una revisión de literatura, que describió el estado del arte de las investigaciones y estudios reflexivos publicados entre los años de 2015 y 2019 con respecto a la resiliencia familiar frente a la violencia intrafamiliar y de género (VIFG). Se obtuvieron resultados preliminares de 3160 documentos, que fueron depurados a 74 artículos, que respondieron a criterios de inclusión como: Artículos Originales, de Reflexión, Revisión de literatura, Estudios Cualitativos, Cuantitativos o Mixtos publicados entre 2015 y 2019. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos: PubMed, Ebsco Host, Science Direct, Scopus, PsyINFO, SAGE, Sprinter, y Taylor & Francis. Se encontró una tendencia de estudios aplicados, cualitativos, descriptivos con población participante femenina, infantil y adolescente con reporte de violencia intrafamiliar, realizados en Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y Canadá. Sin embargo, se pudo observar que la literatura hace referencia indirecta a la resiliencia familiar, pues en mayor medida se refiere al afrontamiento, recuperación y factores protectores, como fenómenos de interés relacionados con la VIFG. Se concluye que aún son pocos los estudios en los que se incluya explícitamente el fenómeno del género en la VIF, que describen la emergencia de la resiliencia familiar y alternativas de intervención para su desarrollo.

show abstract

Differential Prediction of Resilience Among Individuals With and Without a History of Abuse

Cited by 14 publications

References 37 publications

Adaptation and evaluation of Turkish version of the fear of COVID-19 Scale

Adaptation and evaluation of Turkish version of the fear of COVID-19 Scale

Resilience Following Child Maltreatment: Definitional Considerations and Developmental Variations

Panorama científico de la relación entre la violencia intrafamiliar y de género y la resiliencia familiar: posibilidades, retos y límites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About