2007
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200601007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential protein labeling with thiol‐reactive infrared DY‐680 and DY‐780 maleimides and analysis by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis

Abstract: Differential protein labeling with 2-DE separation is an effective method for distinguishing differences in the protein composition of two or more protein samples. Here, we report on a sensitive infrared-based labeling procedure, adding a novel tool to the many labeling possibilities. Defined amounts of newborn and adult mouse brain proteins and tubulin were exposed to maleimide-conjugated infrared dyes DY-680 and DY-780 followed by 1- and 2-DE. The procedure allows amounts of less than 5 microg of cysteine-la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proteins (2.5 mg) were solubilized, reduced and desalted before being treated with 200 μg of DY-680 or DY-780 in DMF. While this labeling procedure reduces the initial protein pool during the desalting and concentration steps, DY-680 was shown to be highly sensitive with a LLD of 10 fg (labeled tubulin, with no reported standard deviation) [153]. Once again, however, proteins without accessible cys residues were not detected by these maleimides, indicating a level of inter-protein variability that will be sample dependent.…”
Section: Reactive Fluorescent Dyesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proteins (2.5 mg) were solubilized, reduced and desalted before being treated with 200 μg of DY-680 or DY-780 in DMF. While this labeling procedure reduces the initial protein pool during the desalting and concentration steps, DY-680 was shown to be highly sensitive with a LLD of 10 fg (labeled tubulin, with no reported standard deviation) [153]. Once again, however, proteins without accessible cys residues were not detected by these maleimides, indicating a level of inter-protein variability that will be sample dependent.…”
Section: Reactive Fluorescent Dyesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additional maleimides include the newly developed DY-680 and DY-780 dyes which are infrared thiol-reactive dyes; these were used to compare newborn and adult murine brains [153]. Proteins (2.5 mg) were solubilized, reduced and desalted before being treated with 200 μg of DY-680 or DY-780 in DMF.…”
Section: Reactive Fluorescent Dyesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DY-maleimide dyes (1 mg dye; 189 Euro) were found to be approximately 50 Â less expensive than CyDye-DIGE saturation-labeling dyes (1380 Euro/kit; 12 multiplexed samples). Nevertheless, if additional 2-DE differential proteomic analyses are needed, CyDye-DIGE minimal labeling or the recently developed infrared maleimide dye-based DIGE method could be applied [15,20,[38][39][40]. In summary, our 2-DE studies suggest that fluorescent DYmaleimide protein labeling is superior to standard fluorescent post-electrophoresis staining, leading to a threefold increase in the number of protein spots detectable, a twofold higher protein spot quality, and an up to 100 times more sensitive pattern intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Each sample is initially alkylated with either unlabeled NEM or IAC, reduced, and fluorescently labeled with either green Cy3-or red Cy5-maleimide to code each sample (57). Infrared maleimide-based probes DY-680 and DY-780 have also been used to improve the sensitivity of detection (58). After labeling, the samples are combined and separated by 2D-gel electrophoresis.…”
Section: Redox Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%