2009
DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential proteomic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract: Abstract. The principal aim of the present study consisted in the identification of the disregulated proteins associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The differences in protein expression between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the corresponding non-HCC liver tissues were investigated in a cohort of 20 patients using twodimensional fluorescence difference in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). The upand down-regulated protein spots that exhibited 1.5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the proteomics-based approach has turned out to be a promising one, offering several quantification techniques to reveal differences in protein expression that are caused by a particular disease. In most studies, the well-established 2D-DIGE technique has been applied for protein quantification followed by identification via mass spectrometry (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Even if the quantification is very accurate and sensitive in this gel-based approach, the relatively high amount of protein sample necessary for protein identification is the major disadvantage of this technique.…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the proteomics-based approach has turned out to be a promising one, offering several quantification techniques to reveal differences in protein expression that are caused by a particular disease. In most studies, the well-established 2D-DIGE technique has been applied for protein quantification followed by identification via mass spectrometry (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Even if the quantification is very accurate and sensitive in this gel-based approach, the relatively high amount of protein sample necessary for protein identification is the major disadvantage of this technique.…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance toward cytotoxic chemotherapy also affects survival and prognosis in patients with HCC (23). We and other groups have found that the expression of SBP1 is decreased in most HCCs and is associated with poor outcomes (13), but the possible molecular mechanism of SBP1 in HCC biology, particularly in cancer invasion and metastasis, has not been studied. Given the relationship among SBP1, GPX1, HIF-1a, and oxidative stress in the HCC microenvironment, in this study, we aimed to explore the role of SBP1 in cancer invasion and metastasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased SBP1 was found in a vast number of human cancers, such as colorectal cancer (9), lung adenocarcinomas (10), ovarian cancer (11), gastric cancer (12), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; ref. 13). However, the molecular mechanism underlying the tumor suppressive functions of SBP1 remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) technology, using a mixed-sample internal standard, is now recognized as an accurate method to determine and quantify human proteins, reducing inter-gel variability and simplifying gel analysis [5]. Several groups including our own have adopted this high throughput approach to evaluate the global expression of proteins in several human cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [6], colorectal cancer [7], esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [8], breast cancer [9], ovarian cancer [10], bladder Cancer [11], PCa [12], [13] and pancreatic cancer [14]. However, there have been the large number of candidate proteins identified using high throughput platforms and it is lack of consistency among different detection systems because of the heterogeneity of the patient cohorts and the difference in platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%