“…Most CV% values were found within the 0–20% range, and the detailed CV% distribution across sample groups was as follows: (a) CV% within 0–20% for the following: females, P2: 71.9%, P8: 79.6%, P15: 80%, P22: 78%; males: P2: 72.5%, P8: 81.5%, P15: 71.9%, P22: 70.8%; (b) CV% within 20–40% for the following: females, P2: 19.2%, P8: 14.2%, P15: 14.2%, P22: 15%; males: P2: 19.4%, P8: 14.1%, P15: 18.9%, P22: 19.4%; (c) CV% within 40–60% for the following: females, P2: 6.3%, P8: 4.1%, P15: 3.9%, P22: 3.8%; males: P2: 5.4%, P8: 2.9%, P15: 5.9%, P22: 5.9%; (d) CV% within 60–100% for the following: females, P2: 2.5%, P8: 1.9%, P15: 1.6%, P22: 2.2%; males: P2: 2.2%, P8: 1.3%, P15: 2.5%, P22: 2.8%; (e) CV% above 100% for the following: females, P2: 0.20%, P8: 0.20%, P15: 0.27%, P22: 0.16%; males: P2: 0.43%, P8: 0.20%, P15: 0.82%, P22: 1.06%, where the listed percent values following the PND symbols represent the percentage of proteins quantified in a given male and female category falling within the protein abundance CV% range. The logarithmic ratios, abundance ratio (log 2 ) (female, P X )/(female, P 22 ) and abundance ratio (log 2 ) (male, P X )/(male, P 22 ), x = 2, 8, 15, and 22, and the corresponding adjusted p -values generated by PDv.2.5 were used for the data comparison with the datasets available from refs , , and . Consequently, the mouse cortex synaptosome-fraction data from Supplementary Table 1 in ref were re-normalized from P280 to P21 by subtracting the Excel columns H from F and H from G: log 2 (P n /P280) – log 2 (P21/P280) = log 2 (P n /P21), where n = 9 and 15.…”